Re: future time-date stamp on emails on new sendmail box???

2002-09-11 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 04:14:12PM +0800, Mario Zuppini wrote: > I work for a small isp and we have just got a new mailserver up and > operational running Debian 3.0 w/ sendmail + qpopper etc. The box is > handling the loads fine all but for one problem, any mail that passes > through the server, 1

Re: failing all vrrp interfaces.

2002-09-11 Thread Steve Mickeler
It appears that the vrrp IP is removed when a regular kill signal is issued the the vrrpd PID. It was only when kill -9 was issued to the PID that the IP would be left on the interface. I've also decided to use keepalived (http://keepalived.sourceforge.net/) since its vrrpd implemenation is quite

UDP checksums fail with basic inetd services at high rates

2002-09-11 Thread Christian Hammers
Hi I have to prove the bit error rate of a network and wanted to simply send a couple of Gigs to the echo port of a remote computer and compare the /proc/net/snmp values for Udp:InErrors and Tcp:InErrs which, according to my information, count the incorrect tcp/udp checksums. Sadly while playing

Re: failing all vrrp interfaces.

2002-09-11 Thread Philipp Schmidt
On Mon, 2002-09-09 13:56:10 -0400, Steve Mickeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The issue I'm trying to tackle is dealing with multiple interfaces in > vrrpd. I need to make sure that all vrrpd daemons and aliases on the > failed server are brought down. > > One th

ISPMan 0.9.3 Problems

2002-09-11 Thread remon
Hey list! :) I'm running a debian server and just installed ispman 0.9.3 but I've got some problems. Everything seemed like it worked but when I add a domain it doesn't create the folder with the domain name on my /www partition, and the domain's ftp account doesn't work either :/ I'm running p

Re: virtual domains and mailman with Postfix

2002-09-11 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 10 Sep 2002 11:06, Henrik Hempelmann wrote: > > Now lists.example.com is a CNAME pointing to server.example.com. > > > > So why is mail sent from the local machine with mailx working, while a > > message sent on port 25 with the same content is rejected? > > External MTA are rewriting (cano