Hello List :
I have a big size file about 33G in /home directory !!! and i wanna
backup this file into tape device
Unfortunately, My tape just 24G(compressd).so that i must be change tape
when data write into tape device...
How should i do???
shell > tar cjvf /dev/st0 /home
On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 09:50:31AM -0300, UnKnown wrote:
> Hi people I'm having some problems here may be someone can give me a hand
> with. The chanel out is compleaty full mrtg grafic is up to the top, and
> when I run netwatch some IP's look out of place most of the hosts on the
> local network
Has anyone noticed a rash of scans and UDP attacks coming from Level3.net?
I've seen a high number of them, all directed UDP attacks. Is this a new
DOS or other attack?
Joe
> I'm a sysadmin in a small ISP here in Argentina, and I'm not using
> osirusoft rbl, why? fibertel. What's that? A big cable-ISP (in .ar,
obviously)
> who gives BOTH dinamic and static IP address for their customers, the
> mails coming from the static one are (mostly) legit mails from real
Jason,
I'm a sysadmin in a small ISP here in Argentina, and I'm not using
osirusoft rbl, why? fibertel. What's that? A big cable-ISP (in .ar, obviously)
who gives BOTH dinamic and static IP address for their customers, the
mails coming from the static one are (mostly) legit mails from real
For some reason, procmail seems to be sporadically losing messages into thin
air. Only a few messages are being lost, but they are important messages (as
opposed to spam). I can see the specific message subjects and sender
addresses in the procmail.log file, but not in the mailbox file. The mailbox
Hi people I'm having some problems here may be someone can give me a hand
with. The chanel out is compleaty full mrtg grafic is up to the top, and
when I run netwatch some IP's look out of place most of the hosts on the
local network show conections to the following the ip x.x.x.255 x.x.x.159
while
Yup, mine did too.
Todd
On Mon, 2002-08-19 at 23:24, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 08:48:35PM -0500, David Stanaway wrote:
> > This is a phoney email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), would the
> > originator please step forward and offer an explanation.
>
> I'm assuming your MTA did
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002 11:54, Philipp Schmidt wrote:
> within this discussion, i got the idea to put an external journal for
> the ext3fs on an raid1-volume the real data on a raid5, hopefully, when
> writing the journal out to the disk having more data to be written an
> once - this would be worth a
On Tue, 2002-08-20 00:42:31 +0200, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Mon, 19 Aug 2002 17:17, you wrote:
> > True. Do you know why ext2 sync-mounted is so abysmally slow? I mean,
> > our RAID was barely breaking a sweat, and bonnie++ was barely using 2-3%
10 matches
Mail list logo
