Re: RBL - Back to basics

2002-05-04 Thread Jorge . Lehner
Hello! On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:34:09AM +1000, Glenn Hocking wrote: > Hi again > > Really the comparison between rbl lists is academic. It is good that > there are many different and evolving systems to block spam accordingly > with different success rates. > > However from a 'email service

Network Question

2002-05-04 Thread Paul
Hi all   I have a problem which may be on my end.   I have a DSL connection with 32 IP's I want to assign a domain its own IP for ssl   This is what I have done in the network file.  IP's are just an example   /sbin/ifconfig eth1 210.16.240.134  broadcast 210.16.240.164  netmask 255.255.255.

Re: Spamassasin over RBL, was Re: rblsmtpd -t?]

2002-05-04 Thread Russell Coker
On Fri, 3 May 2002 19:05, Chris Evans wrote: > Now I'm suddenly getting two apparently separate (qwest.net and > kornet.net) IP addresses (well, several within each domain's IP > space) trying to relay through me at 20 minute intervals. > > I've reported qwest.net to them and don't see any point w

Re: Postfix / Courier IMAP maildir quotas

2002-05-04 Thread Germán Gutierrez
Thedore Knab escribio: (..) > The problem is that quotas are not working. > I was trying to setup up 20M limits for everyone at the kernel level. I > was also trying to setup 20M limits at the application (courier) level. (..) There's a patch for postfix's virtual delivery agent, otherwise you ca