wasnt /var/spool/mail a symlink to /var/mail anyway?
> That's something to check, and ... does some one know why exactly did that
> happen ( the transition from /var/spool/mail to /var/mail), and why the
> upgrade scripts didn't handle that ... I had some very funny problems...
> One ovf them bein
That's something to check, and ... does some one know why exactly did that
happen ( the transition from /var/spool/mail to /var/mail), and why the
upgrade scripts didn't handle that ... I had some very funny problems...
One ovf them being the lack of email for [EMAIL PROTECTED] account :)
On Sun,
wasnt /var/spool/mail a symlink to /var/mail anyway?
> That's something to check, and ... does some one know why exactly did that
> happen ( the transition from /var/spool/mail to /var/mail), and why the
> upgrade scripts didn't handle that ... I had some very funny problems...
> One ovf them bei
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> After a recent system update, ipop3d stopped moving users' mail from
> /var/spool/mail to mbox. Now both 'mail' command and pop3 clients show empty
> mailbox even if exim has in fact pumped /var/spool/mail full of new messages.
Huomenta!
No concrete sol
Hi,
I have a small problem with ipop3d.
After a recent system update, ipop3d stopped moving users' mail from
/var/spool/mail to mbox. Now both 'mail' command and pop3 clients show empty
mailbox even if exim has in fact pumped /var/spool/mail full of new messages.
I previously had ipop3d with s
That's something to check, and ... does some one know why exactly did that
happen ( the transition from /var/spool/mail to /var/mail), and why the
upgrade scripts didn't handle that ... I had some very funny problems...
One ovf them being the lack of email for abuse@domain account :)
On Sun, 17 F
On Sun, 17 Feb 2002, Jarno Elonen wrote:
> After a recent system update, ipop3d stopped moving users' mail from
> /var/spool/mail to mbox. Now both 'mail' command and pop3 clients show empty
> mailbox even if exim has in fact pumped /var/spool/mail full of new messages.
Huomenta!
No concrete so
On Saturday 16 February 2002 10:50 am, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so
>
> If it's commented out, remove the comment and restart apache...
Thanks. I had already uncommented that line, and I did /etc/init.d/apache
restart but that didn't do it. However
Hi,
I have a small problem with ipop3d.
After a recent system update, ipop3d stopped moving users' mail from
/var/spool/mail to mbox. Now both 'mail' command and pop3 clients show empty
mailbox even if exim has in fact pumped /var/spool/mail full of new messages.
I previously had ipop3d with
On Saturday 16 February 2002 10:50 am, Gavin Hamill wrote:
> LoadModule php4_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/libphp4.so
>
> If it's commented out, remove the comment and restart apache...
Thanks. I had already uncommented that line, and I did /etc/init.d/apache
restart but that didn't do it. Howeve
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:09:39AM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
> I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Check your /etc/apache/httpd.conf for this line... it's around line 240
What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Thanks,
--
Michael MerrittO2/CO2 Conversion Specialist [o]
-
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 10:09:39AM -0600, Michael Merritt wrote:
> What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
> I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Check your /etc/apache/httpd.conf for this line... it's around line 240
What package do I need to install to get mod_php support for PHP4 in Apache?
I installed the php4 package, but my php scripts are still not being parsed.
Thanks,
--
Michael MerrittO2/CO2 Conversion Specialist [o]
On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote:
> Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by
> preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS
> and active FTP to work well together, so I've always
> needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with
> misconfigured sites that can't
On Fre, 15 Feb 2002, Asher Densmore-Lynn wrote:
> Can anyone recommend to me a good (non-transparent by
> preference) FTP proxy? I've never managed to get SOCKS
> and active FTP to work well together, so I've always
> needed PASV, and I'm encountering problems with
> misconfigured sites that can'
16 matches
Mail list logo
