On 11 Feb 2002, chris qvigstad wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
> > I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
> > configuration, and just use I
Below is a list of 422 Genealogy Databases with over 1.5
billion names.
I am offering to search these databases for only $1(US)
per search.
Just send a minimum of $10(US) to:
Angie Giles
P.O.Box 873
Rowlett, TX, USA 75030-0873
Because of technical reasons beyond my control, I might
not be ab
Just install another pop3 service with your imap one.. it should work
fine I think... there are some pop daemons available.. I think I remeber
one being ipopd...
good luck
daniel
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 10:37:29AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3
I know a system that on dial-up connections uses
generic user/password (e.g. login: nail / password:
nail) and dial to a provider phone number like:
234-5678. But until now the person can't surf by the
net. It just can view a unique page, which will ask
for real login/password. After this 2nd authe
All the information you search for is in the Cyrus documentation.
/usr/doc/cyrus*
/usr/share/doc/cyrus*
I am simply running Cyrus as a demo, so here are my packages:
ii cyrus21-admin 2.1.0.0preCVS2 Cyrus mail system (administration tool)
ii cyrus21-common 2.1.0.0preCVS2 Cyrus mail system (co
Er, no DMA in the kernel?
Matt.
- Original Message -
From: "Maarten Vink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 3:46 PM
Subject: Re: SLow server
> Try vmstat and check for disk I/O when users are accessing their
mailboxes?
>
> Maa
Try vmstat and check for disk I/O when users are accessing their mailboxes?
Maarten
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Billson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 9:40 PM
Subject: SLow server
> Hello *,
> Got a weird server problem that I could use some pointers wh
Hello *,
Got a weird server problem that I could use some pointers where to look. I
have a PIII 600 Dell server with 1 IDE HD and 128Mb or RAM running 2.2.19Pre17
potato. The server is lightly loaded - basically IMAP and Apache Web mail for
about 20 users.
The problem is the thing is *Slow*
I am building a new fileserver, and I will be using an sgi-xfs kernel
and lvm on it.
Here is a list of packages that I will upgrade from unstable. Is there
anything that I may have missed out?
debhelper_3.4.6.dsc lilo_22.2-1.dsc openssl_0.9.6c-1.dsc
devfsd_1.3.23-1.dsc lsof
I've currently installed cyrus imap server and I can create mail boxes. But
I don't know how to integrate it to postfix (and postfix virtual domain).
Questions:
===
If I create a mailbox: user.id
To which e-mail adress is expected to send mail for this user?
Which password is supossed to ha
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
> I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
> configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
>
> Thank's Josep
>
I've currently installed cyrus imap server and I can create mail boxes. But
I don't know how to integrate it to postfix (and postfix virtual domain).
Questions:
===
If I create a mailbox: user.id
To which e-mail adress is expected to send mail for this user?
Which password is supossed to h
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 at 10:37:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
Yes, it is. They use different TCP ports.
> I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
> configuration, and just use
Hi,
Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
Thank's Josep
Hi,
Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
Thank's Josep
>
> so a 4 x 40GB drive raid-5 array would give either 120GB (no hot-spare)
> or 80GB (1 hot-spare)
Yeap... thats why I said both RAID 10 and RAID 5 in this case would give
80G usable.
>
> > > The question becomes... which provides more performance and is more
> > > reliable?
> raid 10 is slig
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:34, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Okay... for those of you following the previous RAID discussion... I
> > bought the 3ware cards.
> >
> > Each server has 4 40G hard disks (identical). What RAID level/config
do
> > you suggest?
> > Main usage is web/database/mail server (the usual h
On Mon, 2002-02-11 at 10:37, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
> I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
> configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
>
> Thank's Josep
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 at 10:37:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
Yes, it is. They use different TCP ports.
> I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
> configuration, and just use
Hi,
Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
Thank's Josep
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Hi,
Is itpossible to have concurrent POP3 and IMAP servers running on my potato?
I don't want to annoy my current customers to switch their POP outlook
configuration, and just use IMAP for my new webmail service.
Thank's Josep
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
>
> so a 4 x 40GB drive raid-5 array would give either 120GB (no hot-spare)
> or 80GB (1 hot-spare)
Yeap... thats why I said both RAID 10 and RAID 5 in this case would give
80G usable.
>
> > > The question becomes... which provides more performance and is more
> > > reliable?
> raid 10 is sli
On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:34, Jason Lim wrote:
> Okay... for those of you following the previous RAID discussion... I
> bought the 3ware cards.
>
> Each server has 4 40G hard disks (identical). What RAID level/config do
> you suggest?
> Main usage is web/database/mail server (the usual hosting setup).
> On Mon, 11 Feb 2002 06:34, Jason Lim wrote:
> > Okay... for those of you following the previous RAID discussion... I
> > bought the 3ware cards.
> >
> > Each server has 4 40G hard disks (identical). What RAID level/config
do
> > you suggest?
> > Main usage is web/database/mail server (the usual
24 matches
Mail list logo
