Re: user-agent log problem

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Billson
Hmmm, seems right. A couple thoughts: 1) Do you have any other CustomLog directives that are not commented out 2) Are you running NameVirtualHosts where you'd have to define a CustomLog for each? Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet

user-agent log problem

2002-01-12 Thread seezov
hi, in my logs files don't aper the user-agent (Mozilla, lynx ecc...) logs .. why ? example: debian - - [12/Jan/2002:14:03:02 +0100] "GET /doc/HTML/web/w3/index.html HTTP/1.1" 200 5208 and in my httpd.conf ... ... LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combin

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Florian Bantner
On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Peter Billson wrote: > > But I think this is an inherent UNIX / LDAP problem. LDAP seems > > a very powerful tool doing for UNIX everything the 'Regestry' has > > done for windows - and more. Whats missing here is some standardized > > way of how to do it. > > Now there is

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Kevin Littlejohn
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 00:18, Florian Bantner wrote: > On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Kevin Littlejohn wrote: > > Seems to me so, too. > > I wonder if this problem is so far of that there are no > 'standard' ways of doing it. Every MTA has it's way, every > IMAP/POP3 MDA has it's own way - where mta1 only

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Billson
> But I think this is an inherent UNIX / LDAP problem. LDAP seems > a very powerful tool doing for UNIX everything the 'Regestry' has > done for windows - and more. Whats missing here is some standardized > way of how to do it. Now there is something to strive for. One monolithic, incomprehensib

Re: user-agent log problem

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Billson
Hmmm, seems right. A couple thoughts: 1) Do you have any other CustomLog directives that are not commented out 2) Are you running NameVirtualHosts where you'd have to define a CustomLog for each? Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Florian Bantner
On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Kevin Littlejohn wrote: Seems to me so, too. I wonder if this problem is so far of that there are no 'standard' ways of doing it. Every MTA has it's way, every IMAP/POP3 MDA has it's own way - where mta1 only works with mda2 and mta3 only with mda1. Worst of all the IMAP se

user-agent log problem

2002-01-12 Thread seezov
hi, in my logs files don't aper the user-agent (Mozilla, lynx ecc...) logs .. why ? example: debian - - [12/Jan/2002:14:03:02 +0100] "GET /doc/HTML/web/w3/index.html HTTP/1.1" 200 5208 and in my httpd.conf ... ... LogFormat "%h %l %u %t \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\"" combi

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Florian Bantner
On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Peter Billson wrote: > > But I think this is an inherent UNIX / LDAP problem. LDAP seems > > a very powerful tool doing for UNIX everything the 'Regestry' has > > done for windows - and more. Whats missing here is some standardized > > way of how to do it. > > Now there is

Re: Fwd: scp, no ssh

2002-01-12 Thread Marcel Hicking
On 11 Jan 2002, at 0:06, martin f krafft wrote: > > --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > also sprach Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [2002.01.10.1646 +0100]: > /bin/true will log you

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Kevin Littlejohn
On Sun, 2002-01-13 at 00:18, Florian Bantner wrote: > On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Kevin Littlejohn wrote: > > Seems to me so, too. > > I wonder if this problem is so far of that there are no > 'standard' ways of doing it. Every MTA has it's way, every > IMAP/POP3 MDA has it's own way - where mta1 only

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Peter Billson
> But I think this is an inherent UNIX / LDAP problem. LDAP seems > a very powerful tool doing for UNIX everything the 'Regestry' has > done for windows - and more. Whats missing here is some standardized > way of how to do it. Now there is something to strive for. One monolithic, incomprehensi

Re: EXIM, LDAP and some pop3 stuff?

2002-01-12 Thread Florian Bantner
On Sam, 12 Jan 2002, Kevin Littlejohn wrote: Seems to me so, too. I wonder if this problem is so far of that there are no 'standard' ways of doing it. Every MTA has it's way, every IMAP/POP3 MDA has it's own way - where mta1 only works with mda2 and mta3 only with mda1. Worst of all the IMAP s

Re: xinetd /etc/host.deny ALL:PARANOID

2002-01-12 Thread Christian Kurz
On 11/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the > > > >

Re: Fwd: scp, no ssh

2002-01-12 Thread Marcel Hicking
On 11 Jan 2002, at 0:06, martin f krafft wrote: > > --+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > also sprach Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [2002.01.10.1646 +0100]: > /bin/true will log you

Re: xinetd /etc/host.deny ALL:PARANOID

2002-01-12 Thread Christian Kurz
On 11/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote: > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 11:52:15AM +0100, Christian Kurz wrote: > > On 10/01/02, Nathan E Norman wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > > > first, the IP is taken and reverse-resolved to a domain name. then the > > >