Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Michael Wood
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 02:25:42PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote: > The WS FTP thingy you're refering to is for going through > proxies. Some folks just don't know the difference between > firewalls and proxies. :) To do this just set up port Indeed. That's partially because in WS_FTP/CuteFTP etc.

Exim

2001-08-28 Thread Craig
Hello fellas Wanted to know if there is a way of restricting message sizes for different directors in exim ?> eg UUCP, local deliveries and smtp ..Craig -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: named

2001-08-28 Thread Michael Wood
Hi On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 04:21:27PM +1000, Tony Green wrote: > * This one time, at band camp, vijaya said: > > hi all, > > i ahve redhat 7.1 and the named is unable to shutdown > > > > Any suggestions regarding this > > but starting the named is successful Are you sure it actually starts? Bu

Re: named

2001-08-28 Thread Tony Green
* This one time, at band camp, vijaya said: > hi all, > i ahve redhat 7.1 and the named is unable to shutdown > > Any suggestions regarding this > but starting the named is successful > > After loading the configuration from /etc/named.conf this is the next > message in /var/log/messages > > na

Re: Help: No Connect ppp

2001-08-28 Thread Tony Green
* This one time, at band camp, Dario Columbich said: > The pppconfig create two files en ../peers/provider and /chatscripts/provider, but >the pon ../chatscripts/provider command come back the following error message : "call >option value may not contain .. or start with / ", I cannot find the

Help: No Connect ppp

2001-08-28 Thread Dario Columbich
The pppconfig create two files en ../peers/provider and /chatscripts/provider, but the pon ../chatscripts/provider command come back the following error message : "call option value may not contain  .. or start with / ", I cannot find the right configuration and the error itself . Thanks.  

named

2001-08-28 Thread vijaya
hi all, i ahve redhat 7.1 and the named is unable to shutdown Any suggestions regarding this but starting the named is successful After loading the configuration from /etc/named.conf this is the next message in /var/log/messages named[735]:master.c:1172:unexpected error: named[735]:dns_master_l

Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Wagner
Are you also permitting the ftp-data port to go through? Ftp is 21, and I sorta forget the number for ftp-data. :) At 10:32 PM 8/28/01 +, Martin WHEELER wrote: >230 User logged in, access restrictions apply. >Remote system type is UNIX. >Using binary mode to transfer files. >ftp> pwd >257 "

Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
On 28 Aug 2001, Fraser Campbell wrote: > Are you using passive mode? Thanks folks -- entering pftp at the command line now works a treat. (I was busting a gut trying to use FileRunner to go thro' the firewall.) Now -- anyone know how to persuade FileRunner to accept passive mode FTP from the a

Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Fraser Campbell
Martin WHEELER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 200 PORT command successful. > . . . . . > 425 Can't build data connection: Operation timed out. > ftp> > > Huh? > > Any clueful hints; comments? Are you using passive mode? -- Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> S

RE: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Simon Boulet
I believe you need to use PASSIVE mode/transfert. -Original Message- From: Martin WHEELER [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 6:33 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Alisson Sellaro; Chris Wagner Subject:Re: FTP thro' firewall On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Chris

Re: passwd file is locked

2001-08-28 Thread Gregory Wood
Sorry about this -- answering my own question.   The problem was passwd.lock. Deleted and it works fine. However, in general it is better to: rm *-    (passwd-, shadow-, etc) rm ptmp rm *.lock    (passwd.lock, etc)   Make sure before you do that you are only getting passwd, shadow, and gr

Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Chris Wagner wrote: > The WS FTP thingy you're refering to is for going through proxies. ... so much for Windows ... > just set up port forwarding on the firewall ... > and only allow ftp connections from your known boxes to pass > through. Allow nothing from the jung

passwd file is locked

2001-08-28 Thread Gregory Wood
There is probably an easy answer for this -- but I don't know it.   I was operating remotely, changing a password for a user and got the message: segmentation fault. I went to the server and looked over the files and the processes and found nothing. So, I ran the passwd program again and this

Re: mailman & exim

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, I. Forbes wrote: > Look in exim.conf for a block similar to this . . . > and add the last line "user = list" or perhaps "user = mailman" and > see if that helps. Let that be a lesson to me not to adopt an "if in doubt, leave it out" attitude to configuring newly-installed p

Re: FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Chris Wagner
The WS FTP thingy you're refering to is for going through proxies. Some folks just don't know the difference between firewalls and proxies. :) To do this just set up port forwarding on the firewall. Use ipchains or something and only allow ftp connections from your known boxes to pass through.

Re: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Alisson Sellaro
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Craig wrote: > Nothing, thats what i used, only thing is its version 1.30 > whereas if you download the source its 2.01 > You could also download the source from testing... in my box I've compiled it and it is 2.1.6. Just my $2 cents. -- :wq -- Sellar

RE: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Craig wrote: > only thing is its version 1.30 > whereas if you download the source its 2.01 > Ah -- OK. Thanks for clueing me in -- I hadn't realised. Is the difference worth it? (I.e. what can't-possibly-do-without goodies am I going to get that will persuade me to roll

Re: mailman & exim

2001-08-28 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Martin On 28 Aug 2001, at 12:50, Martin WHEELER wrote: > 2001-08-28 12:14:52 15bhjt-SE-00 Neither the system_aliases > director nor the address_pipe transport set a uid for local > delivery of |/var/lib/mailman/mail/wrapper post -l Look in exim.conf for a block similar to this sy

RE: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Craig
Nothing, thats what i used, only thing is its version 1.30 whereas if you download the source its 2.01 > ..Craig -Original Message- From: Martin WHEELER [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2001 3:22 PM To: Jean Baptiste Lallement Cc: Peter Kok; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL

Re: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jean Baptiste Lallement wrote: > "I'm feeling lucky" with query "webalizer" on google.com gave me > http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/ So what's wrong with : "apt-get install webalizer" then? -- Martin Wheeler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subjec

Re: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Jean Baptiste Lallement
Hi, n Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:55:24AM -0400, Peter Kok wrote: > Hi all > > Could you let me know where I can download the webalizer on the internet? "I'm feeling lucky" with query "webalizer" on google.com gave me http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/ O> > Tks > > Regards > Peter > > Rob Woodw

FTP thro' firewall

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
Given a small local network, with nodes using a variety of OSes (Winx; SuSE; Debian), and a firewall using Mandrake SNF, how does one FTP thro' the firewall (safely) from one of the Debian (kernel 2.2.19) nodes? Or is this a complete no-no? Apparently the Win version of WS FTP has some sort of a

Re: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Peter Kok
Hi all Could you let me know where I can download the webalizer on the internet? Tks Regards Peter Rob Woodward wrote: > Hi, > > One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host > I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too. > > Cheers, > > Rob > >

mailman & exim

2001-08-28 Thread Martin WHEELER
A recent upgrade has meant that I'm now using exim where before I was using smail. mailman worked beautifully under this setup; but today has begun sending me messages as follows: 2001-08-28 12:14:52 15bhjt-SE-00 Neither the system_aliases director nor the address_pipe transport set a uid f

Re: Webalizer

2001-08-28 Thread Olivier MACCHIONI
At 08:23 28/08/01 +0100, Rob Woodward wrote: >Hi, > >One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host >I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too. My 2 cents : for arf in `find /opt/web/web2/home/*/logs/access_log` do $WEBALIZER -o /tmp -Q