You fail to understand. Drop traffic from any MAC/IP pair that isn't
"registered" with you, thus in your traffic shaper configuration. Keeping
track of MAC addresses and where they're supposed to be on your network in a
campus environment is pretty standard. I work on a University campus and
mus
You fail to understand. Drop traffic from any MAC/IP pair that isn't
"registered" with you, thus in your traffic shaper configuration. Keeping
track of MAC addresses and where they're supposed to be on your network in a
campus environment is pretty standard. I work on a University campus and
mu
On Saturday 30 June 2001 17:49, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:33AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> > Basically, I have 20 gigs of space to tinker with (well, there's
> > really 40 there, but I run a hardware RAID 10). I also have half a
> > gig of SDRAM (sure th
Outlook ignores the SMTP spec by not enclosing the e-mail addresses in angle
brackets (although microsoft blames "older mail server systems"):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-US&SD=gn&FR=0
Djb did a workaround for this (stupid RFC ignorant clients) on qmail
ve
On Saturday 30 June 2001 17:49, Christian Hammers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:33AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> > Basically, I have 20 gigs of space to tinker with (well, there's
> > really 40 there, but I run a hardware RAID 10). I also have half a
> > gig of SDRAM (sure t
Currently I am having a problem with qmail.
Our users are getting the following error when sending mail via
SMTP:
"No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient"
The client they are using is Microsoft
Outlook. I can send via Outlook express, and it works fine on m
Outlook ignores the SMTP spec by not enclosing the e-mail addresses in angle
brackets (although microsoft blames "older mail server systems"):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-US&SD=gn&FR=0
Djb did a workaround for this (stupid RFC ignorant clients) on qmail
v
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:59:34 -0400, "Jeff S Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
> address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem.
There is no requirement to run 2.4.x and iptables, nor iproute2, to a
Currently I am having a problem with qmail.
Our users are getting the following error when sending mail via
SMTP:
"No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient"
The client they are using is Microsoft
Outlook. I can send via Outlook express, and it works fine on m
On Sun, 1 Jul 2001 15:59:34 -0400, "Jeff S Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been reading this thread and noticed no one has suggested the MAC
> address filtering capabilities in Linux 2.4's new ip tables subsystem.
There is no requirement to run 2.4.x and iptables, nor iproute2, to
10 matches
Mail list logo
