On Sat, Jun 30, 2001 at 06:23:19AM +0200, Maurice Verhagen wrote:
>
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2001, anon wrote:
>
> > my problem is that some local users are changing their own local ip numbers
> > (like, 192.168.1.40 to 192.168.1.50) then bypassing the Traffic shaper
> > bandwidth limitation. (that was
> "RC" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RC> On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
>> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the
>> IS department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to
>> point at their email server. Does it make
> On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
>> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the IS
>> department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to point at their
>> email server. Does it make sense and is it possible to set up another
>> MX record: @lists.mydomain
> From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:42:21 +0800
> To: "Eirik Dentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Subject: Re: MTA - MLM - DNS configuration question
>
> I've been optimizing a number of email servers for a client now, AND I c
On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the IS
> department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to point at their
> email server. Does it make sense and is it possible to set up another
> MX record: @lists.mydomain.org whi
> "RC" == Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RC> On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
>> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the
>> IS department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to
>> point at their email server. Does it make
> On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
>> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the IS
>> department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to point at their
>> email server. Does it make sense and is it possible to set up another
>> MX record: @lists.mydomai
> From: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: "Jason Lim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:42:21 +0800
> To: "Eirik Dentz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: MTA - MLM - DNS configuration question
>
> I've been optimizing a number of email servers for a
On Saturday 30 June 2001 04:43, Eirik Dentz wrote:
> My question is this: The DNS is under the jurisdiction of the IS
> department and the MX record @mydomain.org is set up to point at their
> email server. Does it make sense and is it possible to set up another
> MX record: @lists.mydomain.org wh
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:33AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Basically, I have 20 gigs of space to tinker with (well, there's really 40
> there, but I run a hardware RAID 10). I also have half a gig of SDRAM
> (sure
> this would matter with swap space). Now, I have no prob
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:55:23AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
> postfix and altered the debian/rules file to add SASL support for SMTP
> auth.
> The build went fine, but it apparently alwa
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:13:33AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Basically, I have 20 gigs of space to tinker with (well, there's really 40
> there, but I run a hardware RAID 10). I also have half a gig of SDRAM (sure
> this would matter with swap space). Now, I have no proble
On Friday 29 June 2001 17:52, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
>
> [Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (1
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 11:55:23AM -0400, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> Anyone here have all this working together? I apt-get'ed the source for
> postfix and altered the debian/rules file to add SASL support for SMTP auth.
> The build went fine, but it apparently always
I've been optimizing a number of email servers for a client now, AND I can
tell you that ANY disk access apart from the mail system will severely
impact the speed of the server, unless you're talking real low volume. As
soon as you start to get around 200-300K per day, you're gonna need to
seperate
On Friday 29 June 2001 17:52, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> I have noticed the following lines in Apache's error.log:
>
> [Fri Jun 29 17:35:41 2001] [notice] child pid 18786 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (11)
> [Fri Jun 29 17:35:54 2001] [notice] child pid 20229 exit signal
> Segmentation fault (
I've been optimizing a number of email servers for a client now, AND I can
tell you that ANY disk access apart from the mail system will severely
impact the speed of the server, unless you're talking real low volume. As
soon as you start to get around 200-300K per day, you're gonna need to
seperat
17 matches
Mail list logo
