On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Duane Powers wrote:
> Fantastic advice, thanks.
one thing i forgot to mention:
if there's any mail left in the sendmail queue after the conversion,
then postfix won't know about it and won't be able to deliver it.
before you uninstall sendmail, shut it d
Revisiting traceroute.org, I see that they have a whole list of route
servers. :)
At 01:09 PM 6/27/01 +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
>Here's a machine that used to provide such a service, not sure if it
>still does:
>
>route-views.oregon-ix.net
---==---
___/``\___
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 07:27:52PM -0700, Duane Powers wrote:
> Fantastic advice, thanks.
one thing i forgot to mention:
if there's any mail left in the sendmail queue after the conversion,
then postfix won't know about it and won't be able to deliver it.
before you uninstall sendmail, shut it
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Duane Powers wrote:
> security conscious
> virtual email accounts, likely using LDAP
> spam control
> ease of configuration
>
> I"m kinda leaning toward postfix, but that's just because I like the
> cover of the book I saw at borders yesterday
postfix i
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> "/bin/ls | wc" has taken 1 (one) second. "ls | wc" lasted 3 minutes and 26
> seconds. Yes, near 3 and a half minutes!
>
> This is because "ls" with additional information (e.g. file type, which is
> needed to colour a listing) needs
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 08:48:19AM -0700, Duane Powers wrote:
> security conscious
> virtual email accounts, likely using LDAP
> spam control
> ease of configuration
>
> I"m kinda leaning toward postfix, but that's just because I like the
> cover of the book I saw at borders yesterday
postfix
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> "/bin/ls | wc" has taken 1 (one) second. "ls | wc" lasted 3 minutes and 26
> seconds. Yes, near 3 and a half minutes!
>
> This is because "ls" with additional information (e.g. file type, which is
> needed to colour a listing) need
All other issues aside ... some might find the qmail license
to be quite onerous.
--
Jean-Paul Stewart
Senior Systems Administrator
CarbonMedia, Inc.
114 East 25th Street, Eighth Floor
New York, NY 10010
Phone: 212.253.7180
Fax: 212.253.8467
http://www.carbonmedia.com/
Nick Jennings wrote:
It seems that you've had little experience with anything but sendmail,
so you're opinion may be rather biased.
I have used sendmail, exim, postfix and qmail and I think that exim and
postfix are very good, high performance yet easily configurable and
maintainable mail serv
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> I guess my thoughts are:
> 1) Let me know what sendmail can do to help
> 2) If you want to switch, check to see if you've got anything tricky
> in your rules - you *WILL* loose functionality with any other MTA
> (tu
All other issues aside ... some might find the qmail license
to be quite onerous.
--
Jean-Paul Stewart
Senior Systems Administrator
CarbonMedia, Inc.
114 East 25th Street, Eighth Floor
New York, NY 10010
Phone: 212.253.7180
Fax: 212.253.8467
http://www.carbonmedia.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Nick Jennings wrote:
> It seems that you've had little experience with anything but sendmail,
> so you're opinion may be rather biased.
>
> I have used sendmail, exim, postfix and qmail and I think that exim and
> postfix are very good, high performance yet easily configurable and
> maintain
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 01:18:41PM -0400, Richard A Nelson wrote:
>
> I guess my thoughts are:
> 1) Let me know what sendmail can do to help
> 2) If you want to switch, check to see if you've got anything tricky
> in your rules - you *WILL* loose functionality with any other MTA
> (t
Check out mail-abuse.org. They are the ones who actually run the RBL.
vix.com no longer mirrors the RBL. According to the mail-abuse web page
vix.com stopped on June 15th.
I didn't read why..I would have been very sad to see the RBL go away. You
scared me ;)
Greg
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Duane P
Greg Rowe wrote:
What do you mean departure of the rbl? blackhole.mail-abuse.org still
works?
I read a thread on one of the debian lists a couple weeks ago about one
of the spam databases going away... a couple of days later, I started
getting lots of this
daemon.log.0:Jun 21 22:18:37 ns1 name
What do you mean departure of the rbl? blackhole.mail-abuse.org still
works?
I have been researching MTAs for a little while trying to figure out what
I want to use instead of sendmail. I was looking for maildir delivery,
ease of configuration, support for virtual hosting, and virtual accounts.
DP> Hey all,
DP> I've been using sendmail 8.11 for the last couple of years, and while
DP> not real easy to configure, it has fit my purposes well. I was using
DP> the rbl to cut down on unwanted spam for my users, but with the
DP> departure of the rbl, I'm finding my server passing more spam to m
Hey all,
I've been using sendmail 8.11 for the last couple of years, and while
not real easy to configure, it has fit my purposes well. I was using the
rbl to cut down on unwanted spam for my users, but with the departure of
the rbl, I'm finding my server passing more spam to my users, I may be
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up "just a little bit"
Check out mail-abuse.org. They are the ones who actually run the RBL.
vix.com no longer mirrors the RBL. According to the mail-abuse web page
vix.com stopped on June 15th.
I didn't read why..I would have been very sad to see the RBL go away. You
scared me ;)
Greg
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Duane
Greg Rowe wrote:
> What do you mean departure of the rbl? blackhole.mail-abuse.org still
> works?
I read a thread on one of the debian lists a couple weeks ago about one
of the spam databases going away... a couple of days later, I started
getting lots of this
daemon.log.0:Jun 21 22:18:37 n
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 at 13:25:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
> > something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
> > files. Doing "ls" now is far speedie
What do you mean departure of the rbl? blackhole.mail-abuse.org still
works?
I have been researching MTAs for a little while trying to figure out what
I want to use instead of sendmail. I was looking for maildir delivery,
ease of configuration, support for virtual hosting, and virtual accounts.
DP> Hey all,
DP> I've been using sendmail 8.11 for the last couple of years, and while
DP> not real easy to configure, it has fit my purposes well. I was using
DP> the rbl to cut down on unwanted spam for my users, but with the
DP> departure of the rbl, I'm finding my server passing more spam to
Hey all,
I've been using sendmail 8.11 for the last couple of years, and while
not real easy to configure, it has fit my purposes well. I was using the
rbl to cut down on unwanted spam for my users, but with the departure of
the rbl, I'm finding my server passing more spam to my users, I may b
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 08:14, Chris Wagner wrote:
> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
> lookups and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world.
> The special thing about this router was that you didn't need a user
> name or password to log on wi
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up "just a little bit
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 at 13:25:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
> > SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
> > something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
> > files. Doing "ls" now is far speedi
On Wednesday 27 June 2001 08:14, Chris Wagner wrote:
> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
> lookups and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world.
> The special thing about this router was that you didn't need a user
> name or password to log on w
> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
lookups
> and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The
special
> thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password
to
> log on with. It just gave you the IOS prompt. I haven't been
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:41 EDT, Chris Wagner writes:
>A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route lookups
>and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The special
>thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password to
>log on wit
> A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route
lookups
> and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The
special
> thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password
to
> log on with. It just gave you the IOS prompt. I haven't bee
Thanks for your advice.
I checked 'D' stats process numbers and compare with uptime's value..
yes, your opnion was right. :-)
but I couldn't prove what occurs problem.
There are'nt special messages in kern.log and dmesg.
I'm using 2.4.5 kernel.
What can I do check else?
-Original Message--
A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route lookups
and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The special
thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password to
log on with. It just gave you the IOS prompt. I haven't been on this
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 02:14:41 EDT, Chris Wagner writes:
>A while back, AT&T had a publicly accessible router for doing route lookups
>and stuff like that. It supposedly knew about the whole world. The special
>thing about this router was that you didn't need a user name or password to
>log on wi
35 matches
Mail list logo
