Hello!
Just to throw a word in too.
Every than and now I have been longing for a small partition with a
minimal system, just with what the Debian Installation Disquette
contains (~ 2 M).
When fsck finds a somewhat bigger problem (my clients and friends seem
like to pull the plug or press that fo
Hello!
Just to throw a word in too.
Every than and now I have been longing for a small partition with a
minimal system, just with what the Debian Installation Disquette
contains (~ 2 M).
When fsck finds a somewhat bigger problem (my clients and friends seem
like to pull the plug or press that f
On Saturday 23 June 2001 21:13, Nick Jennings wrote:
> > However if you have a single large partition then when you are
> > writing data the FS drivers can optimise things.
>
> I always thought that this was a performance hit, I know I've read it
> in places before, but I can't seem to find them a
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:19:31AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2001 17:46, Duane Powers wrote:
> > on /. I _always_ use a seprarate /home, so I can keep data in case I
> > have to reinstall the OS, (successful intrustion attempt, etc.) and
>
> Of course the re-installation coul
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:34:59AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2001 04:10, Nick Jennings wrote:
> >
> > The main performance benefit to having directories reside on their own
> > partition relates to file write/read access. It's very important to
> > have var on it's own sep
On Friday 22 June 2001 17:46, Duane Powers wrote:
> Hm, This is interesting, I have almost always used separate partitions,
> such as /var, and it's saved my butt a couple times. If a log file
> starts to run away, which I've had happen a twice, it can't overflow
> the boundaries of the partition
On Saturday 23 June 2001 21:13, Nick Jennings wrote:
> > However if you have a single large partition then when you are
> > writing data the FS drivers can optimise things.
>
> I always thought that this was a performance hit, I know I've read it
> in places before, but I can't seem to find them
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:19:31AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Friday 22 June 2001 17:46, Duane Powers wrote:
> > on /. I _always_ use a seprarate /home, so I can keep data in case I
> > have to reinstall the OS, (successful intrustion attempt, etc.) and
>
> Of course the re-installation cou
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 09:34:59AM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Saturday 23 June 2001 04:10, Nick Jennings wrote:
> >
> > The main performance benefit to having directories reside on their own
> > partition relates to file write/read access. It's very important to
> > have var on it's own se
On Friday 22 June 2001 17:46, Duane Powers wrote:
> Hm, This is interesting, I have almost always used separate partitions,
> such as /var, and it's saved my butt a couple times. If a log file
> starts to run away, which I've had happen a twice, it can't overflow
> the boundaries of the partition
Hi,
thanks for your hints.
Bernd
while configuring dynamic virtual hosting (with mod_vhost_alias) on a new
server i ran into this problem
i create a new group named g(username) for each new virtual web, I set all
user files to chmod 640 to avoid them to be read by another user
my apache server runs as www-data so i need to add u
Hi,
thanks for your hints.
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
while configuring dynamic virtual hosting (with mod_vhost_alias) on a new
server i ran into this problem
i create a new group named g(username) for each new virtual web, I set all
user files to chmod 640 to avoid them to be read by another user
my apache server runs as www-data so i need to add
On Saturday 23 June 2001 04:10, Nick Jennings wrote:
> > > one and waste space. Do the performance gains outweigh this? (I'm
> > > not terribly worried about the redundancy with the RAID 10 and
> > > all).
> >
> > What performance gains are you referring to?
>
> The main performance benefit to h
On Saturday 23 June 2001 03:35, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get
> >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /.
>
> I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a
> sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 04:10:55PM +0200, Teun Vink wrote:
> > Is there a way of selecting packages and storing them in a flat text
> > file, that debian uses to reference in the installation procedure.
>
> dpkg --get-selections > file
> dpkg --set-selections < file
>
> should do the trick if you
On Saturday 23 June 2001 04:10, Nick Jennings wrote:
> > > one and waste space. Do the performance gains outweigh this? (I'm
> > > not terribly worried about the redundancy with the RAID 10 and
> > > all).
> >
> > What performance gains are you referring to?
>
> The main performance benefit to
On Saturday 23 June 2001 03:35, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> >> I was thinking the other way around actually. If /boot were to get
> >> messed up, it wouldn't affect /.
>
> I guess I'm off here. By getting messed up, I mean more by say a
> sudden jolt in the power supply (of course, I do have a
19 matches
Mail list logo
