> "Y2KNET" == Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Y2KNET> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
Y2KNET> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
Y2KNET> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
Y2KNET> ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
Y2KNET> these
Read the ifconfig man page, bring up the addresses you need, then test
Apache. If all is good, throw the IP details in /etc/network/interfaces and
they will come up again after a reboot.
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Se
No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
these ifconfig files.
I do not know how to add additiona IP address for
ifconfig in 2.2r2.
Abu Umai
Here is the real world.
I have primary and secondry servers ns1 and ns2.
The zone file on ns1 includes the following zones:
zone "y2knet.net" {
type master;
file "y2knet.db";
};
zone "jennswing.com" {
type master;
file "jennswing.db";
};
y2knet.db includes:
---
Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Virtual Hosts
> When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
> it does not connect and give the error
> > But when I used Listen, then it did not
> > biring anything even my primary site www.abc.com.
> > If I turned of Listen then my primary site www.abc.com
> > comes up.
Sure. If you set Listen to any IP, Apache *only* listens
to *this* IP. If you leave Listen out, Apache defaults
to listening to
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> Any idea please!
This thread continues and continues ...
Please give us the real hostnames. We may be able to see the problem from
outside.
Make sure the DNS works before even starting with the Apache config. (If
not, you may cause more troubleshooting than yo
When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
it does not connect and give the error
"unable to connect remote host: no route to host"
but when I tried to connect www.abc.net
it connected. It looks like it is not connetcting
to www.xyz.net.
I have the entry for zone xyz.net in named.conf file
> "Y2KNET" == Y2KNET <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Y2KNET> No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
Y2KNET> but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
Y2KNET> in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
Y2KNET> ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
Y2KNET> these
Read the ifconfig man page, bring up the addresses you need, then test
Apache. If all is good, throw the IP details in /etc/network/interfaces and
they will come up again after a reboot.
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Tim Kent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[
No, I have not and here it looks the problem,
but in Debian 2.2r2 there is a networking file
in /etc/init.d, instead of network file where
ifconfig was added. I am trying to find where can I look
these ifconfig files.
I do not know how to add additiona IP address for
ifconfig in 2.2r2.
Abu Uma
Here is the real world.
I have primary and secondry servers ns1 and ns2.
The zone file on ns1 includes the following zones:
zone "y2knet.net" {
type master;
file "y2knet.db";
};
zone "jennswing.com" {
type master;
file "jennswing.db";
};
y2knet.db includes:
---
Have you ifconfig'd the additional addresses you are going to use?
Tim.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Virtual Hosts
> When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
> it does not connect
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> Any idea please!
This thread continues and continues ...
Please give us the real hostnames. We may be able to see the problem from
outside.
Make sure the DNS works before even starting with the Apache config. (If
not, you may cause more troubleshooting than y
When I remotely or internally telnet www.xyz.net,
it does not connect and give the error
"unable to connect remote host: no route to host"
but when I tried to connect www.abc.net
it connected. It looks like it is not connetcting
to www.xyz.net.
I have the entry for zone xyz.net in named.conf file
> But when I used Listen, then it did not
> biring anything even my primary site www.abc.com.
> If I turned of Listen then my primary site www.abc.com
> comes up.
>
> Looks I am wandering somewhere near the solution.
I believe the tag should look like to work right.
Also the ServerName dire
I am using a DDS3 tape drive and was just wanting to know what you all use
for backups. Do you write your own scripts or use a frontend/utility/program
to help out?
Tim.
Yes! I made a typing mistake, instead of writing 192.55.34.5,
I wrote the other address.
I tried the following for www.xyz.net:
Listen 192.55.34.5:80
NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
SeverName xyz.net
ServerAlais www.xyz.net
...
But when I used Listen, then it did
> But when I used Listen, then it did not
> biring anything even my primary site www.abc.com.
> If I turned of Listen then my primary site www.abc.com
> comes up.
>
> Looks I am wandering somewhere near the solution.
I believe the tag should look like to work right.
Also the ServerName dir
I am using a DDS3 tape drive and was just wanting to know what you all use
for backups. Do you write your own scripts or use a frontend/utility/program
to help out?
Tim.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes! I made a typing mistake, instead of writing 192.55.34.5,
I wrote the other address.
I tried the following for www.xyz.net:
Listen 192.55.34.5:80
NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
SeverName xyz.net
ServerAlais www.xyz.net
...
But when I used Listen, then it did
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Erik Abella wrote:
> Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1238, status=deferred
> (Name service error for domain sampledomain.com: Host not found, try again)
Is this the real domain name? (Because from here, it d
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> First one is primary which is, say abc.net
> the second one is VirtualHost xyz.net.
> ns1INA192.55.34.3
> www.abc.net.INCNAMEns1.abc.net.
> xyz.netIN A192.55.34.5
> ..
> www.xyz.net. IN CNAME
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:54:51PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ sorry to reply to myself ... first sign of instability I'm told ]
> |
> | ServerName www.abc.net
> | DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz/
> |
Uh, forget this section ... I looked at your CNAMEs and thought
192.55.34.5 was the IP of
On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Erik Abella wrote:
> Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
> to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1238, status=deferred
> (Name service error for domain sampledomain.com: Host not found, try again)
Is this the real domain name? (Because from here, it
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> First one is primary which is, say abc.net
> the second one is VirtualHost xyz.net.
> ns1INA192.55.34.3
> www.abc.net.INCNAMEns1.abc.net.
> xyz.netIN A192.55.34.5
> ..
> www.xyz.net. IN CNAM
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:39:46PM -0500, Y2KNET wrote:
> The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
> the first dns file is abc.hosts and following is its
> configuration:
>
> INNSns1.abc.net.
> INNSns2.abc.net.
>
> ns1IN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> > NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
> >
> >
> > DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> > ServerName www.xyz.net
> >
>
> NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
> the VirtualHost
All the DNS has to do is point to your IP address and apache takes care of what
site it shows under each domain.
Matt
Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Erich Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 11:10:
> > Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
>
> Well, sure...
> Without a DNS entry no request would r
Hello All,
Thanks for the immediate response, Alson.
>maybe the dns servers named in /etc/resolv.conf often fail?
I added our upstream name servers to our own so I'm keeping my fingers
crossed.
>looks like someting to do with failing dns lookups...
Probably, but it http lookups have no problem r
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:54:51PM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
[ sorry to reply to myself ... first sign of instability I'm told ]
> |
> | ServerName www.abc.net
> | DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz/
> |
Uh, forget this section ... I looked at your CNAMEs and thought
192.55.34.5 was the IP o
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:39:46PM -0500, Y2KNET wrote:
> The dns files resides on server ns1.abc.net
> the first dns file is abc.hosts and following is its
> configuration:
>
> INNSns1.abc.net.
> INNSns2.abc.net.
>
> ns1IN
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 04:08:34PM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> > NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
> >
> >
> > DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> > ServerName www.xyz.net
> >
>
> NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
> the VirtualHos
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:01:11AM -0700, Erik Abella wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My users and I often can't send mail, and when we do, it's after many tries.
>
> Lately, this particular error is perpetually on /var/log/maillog:
>
> Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
> to=<[EM
Hello All,
My users and I often can't send mail, and when we do, it's after many tries.
Lately, this particular error is perpetually on /var/log/maillog:
Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1238, status=deferred
(Name service error
On Sunday 01 April 2001 07:06, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> i don't know about standard but there is a schema for one. (i don't
> remember if it supported services directly but it could be implemented)
>
> the schema comes with directory manager (i can't remember the URL for it
> now check d-d archives)
All the DNS has to do is point to your IP address and apache takes care of what
site it shows under each domain.
Matt
Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Erich Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 11:10:
> > Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
>
> Well, sure...
> Without a DNS entry no request would
Hello All,
Thanks for the immediate response, Alson.
>maybe the dns servers named in /etc/resolv.conf often fail?
I added our upstream name servers to our own so I'm keeping my fingers
crossed.
>looks like someting to do with failing dns lookups...
Probably, but it http lookups have no problem
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 08:01:11AM -0700, Erik Abella wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> My users and I often can't send mail, and when we do, it's after many tries.
>
> Lately, this particular error is perpetually on /var/log/maillog:
>
> Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
> to=<[E
Hello All,
My users and I often can't send mail, and when we do, it's after many tries.
Lately, this particular error is perpetually on /var/log/maillog:
Apr 4 21:24:23 bonifacio postfix/smtp[5692]: E9E591B651:
to=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, relay=none, delay=1238, status=deferred
(Name service error
On Sunday 01 April 2001 07:06, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> i don't know about standard but there is a schema for one. (i don't
> remember if it supported services directly but it could be implemented)
>
> the schema comes with directory manager (i can't remember the URL for it
> now check d-d archives
Tried changing
ServerName www.xyz.net
to
ServerName xyz.net
yet?
I'm just making some guesses here... never tried what you're doing. I always
use A records, not CNAME records as much as possible.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, 04 April, 2001 1
Thanx for your help - sendmail recieves mail now. I hope, I did everithing
right - for
thouse, who want to recieve mail with sendmail in debain my sendmail.mc:
divert(0)
VERSIONID(`@(#)sendmail.mc 8.9.3-21 (Debian) 2309')
OSTYPE(debian)dnl
LOCAL_CONFIG
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
Cwm
Tried changing
ServerName www.xyz.net
to
ServerName xyz.net
yet?
I'm just making some guesses here... never tried what you're doing. I always
use A records, not CNAME records as much as possible.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesd
Thanx for your help - sendmail recieves mail now. I hope, I did everithing right - for
thouse, who want to recieve mail with sendmail in debain my sendmail.mc:
divert(0)
VERSIONID(`@(#)sendmail.mc 8.9.3-21 (Debian) 2309')
OSTYPE(debian)dnl
LOCAL_CONFIG
FEATURE(masquerade_envelope)dnl
Cwm
Hello all.
I have been playing around with CBQ, cbq.init et al for a while, and
have got some impressive results. It works after all!... I have used SFQ
as the leaf queuing discipline on all my classes and created a bounded
class with the total bandwidth I wanted to share (64K), from which
unbound
The original question was about IP based virtual
hosts. These are the settings for name based
virtual host.
Correct, though.
Still I prefer to have the IP in the virtual
host directive. Reduces DNS traffic somewhat
and is more reliable as far as I can tell.
Apache by default responds to *all* I
Erich Kolb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 3 Apr 2001, at 11:10:
> Dont you still have to add DNS entries?
Well, sure...
Without a DNS entry no request would reach your server.
Cheers, Marcel
> -Original Message-
> From: Y2KNET [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 9:43 AM
> To:
> Listen 192.55.34.5:80
> NameVirtualHost 192.55.34.5:80
>
>
> DocumentRoot /var/www/xyz
> ServerName www.xyz.net
>
NameVirtualHost means that you're defining the virtual hosts by name. Change
the VirtualHost line to read:
And make sure you use:
ServerName xyz.net
ServerAlias www.xyz.net
Note the difference between
and
The first is the setting for name based
virtual hosts, i.e. various virtual hosts
sharing one IP (make sure you have one or
many "NameVirtualHost 10.0.0.1" as well)
- in contrast to ip based virtual host
where each virtual host has it's own IP.
Cheers, Marcel
50 matches
Mail list logo
