On Friday 30 March 2001 08:55, Russell Coker wrote:
> > That's not clean. And what you do with FTP and IMAP/POP? You don't need
> > to have a shell for both, but you want to allow only one of those. Of
> > course, yeah, I could have access lists for each of that service not
> > stored in the LDAP t
On Thursday 29 March 2001 22:33, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> > > > Another question is, does anyone have any other suggestions for doing
> > > > such things?
> > >
> > > I would like to do this as well. If you authenticate using PAM and wnat
> > > to exclude users from using ftpd and ssh, but still
When I installed kppp pon stopped working properly.
I have dsl and for those frequent times when it goes out I use dialup.
kppp dials but won't connect. pon used to dial and connect. Now pon does
not dial.
I have gotten some hints on writing new code on the kde reflector. HOWEVER,
I am a desktop
On Friday 30 March 2001 08:55, Russell Coker wrote:
> > That's not clean. And what you do with FTP and IMAP/POP? You don't need
> > to have a shell for both, but you want to allow only one of those. Of
> > course, yeah, I could have access lists for each of that service not
> > stored in the LDAP
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.03.29 13:59]:
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > >
> > > Then just "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade"
> > Doh! Don't do 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Do 'apt-get upgrade' instead,
> > unless you want to install woody.
>
> stable points to pota
On Thursday 29 March 2001 22:33, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> > > > Another question is, does anyone have any other suggestions for doing
> > > > such things?
> > >
> > > I would like to do this as well. If you authenticate using PAM and wnat
> > > to exclude users from using ftpd and ssh, but still
When I installed kppp pon stopped working properly.
I have dsl and for those frequent times when it goes out I use dialup.
kppp dials but won't connect. pon used to dial and connect. Now pon does
not dial.
I have gotten some hints on writing new code on the kde reflector. HOWEVER,
I am a desktop
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> >
> > Then just "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade"
> Doh! Don't do 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Do 'apt-get upgrade' instead,
> unless you want to install woody.
stable points to potato AFAIK. Is there something I am missing here ?
Haim
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> newmachine:# dpkg --set-selections myselection.txt
>
> now use dselect to install it.
Easier to run: 'apt-get dselect-upgrade' instead of running dselect.
bob
--
bob billsonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> dpkg --get-selections >myselection.txt
You should really use:
dpkg --get-selections '*' > myselection.txt
Difference is the '*' gives you a list of installed, removed and purged
packages. Without it you get only a list of ins
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.03.29 13:59]:
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> > >
> > > Then just "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade"
> > Doh! Don't do 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Do 'apt-get upgrade' instead,
> > unless you want to install woody.
>
> stable points to pot
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.03.29 13:04]:
> Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The upgrade is very easy... just do:
> >
> > "wget
> > http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb";
> >
> >
> > to get the file, and:
> >
> > "dpkg -i bind_
Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The upgrade is very easy... just do:
>
> "wget
> http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb";
>
>
> to get the file, and:
>
> "dpkg -i bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb"
Or, even easier, make sure tha
Hello,
you need only the Base-Installation then install all programms needed
and after ths make a
dpkg --get-selections >myselection.txt
Now you can install on other machines the Base-Installation and at the
end quiet it withot any selections. Login as root and make
newmachine:# dpkg --set-s
*yes* ... and it's a big one. Any BIND before 8.2.3 is vulnerable.
Upgrade immediately, and look to see if you have already been hacked.
See the following link for information:
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-026
The upgrade is very easy... just do:
"wget
http://security.debian.org/dis
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and it is using
> bind 8-2.2p7-1.
>
> Is it any security hole in this Debian 2.2r2
> and bind 8-2.2p7-1.
You can find out by looking at Debian's security page or
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-026
The ISC website says:
> > deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/updates main
> >
> > Then just "apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade"
> Doh! Don't do 'apt-get dist-upgrade'. Do 'apt-get upgrade' instead,
> unless you want to install woody.
stable points to potato AFAIK. Is there something I am missing here ?
Hai
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> newmachine:# dpkg --set-selections myselection.txt
>
> now use dselect to install it.
Easier to run: 'apt-get dselect-upgrade' instead of running dselect.
bob
--
bob billsonemail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 09:52:49AM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> dpkg --get-selections >myselection.txt
You should really use:
dpkg --get-selections '*' > myselection.txt
Difference is the '*' gives you a list of installed, removed and purged
packages. Without it you get only a list of in
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and it is
using
bind 8-2.2p7-1.
Is it any security hole in this Debian
2.2r2
and bind 8-2.2p7-1.
Will appreciate any help.
Thanks.
Abu Umair
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.03.29 13:04]:
> Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The upgrade is very easy... just do:
> >
> > "wget
> >
>http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb"
>
> >
> > to get the file, and:
> >
> > "dpkg -i bind_8
Rich Puhek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The upgrade is very easy... just do:
>
> "wget
>
>http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb"
>
>
> to get the file, and:
>
> "dpkg -i bind_8.2.3-0.potato.1_i386.deb"
Or, even easier, make sure th
Hello,
you need only the Base-Installation then install all programms needed
and after ths make a
dpkg --get-selections >myselection.txt
Now you can install on other machines the Base-Installation and at the
end quiet it withot any selections. Login as root and make
newmachine:# dpkg --set-
*yes* ... and it's a big one. Any BIND before 8.2.3 is vulnerable.
Upgrade immediately, and look to see if you have already been hacked.
See the following link for information:
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-026
The upgrade is very easy... just do:
"wget
http://security.debian.org/di
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Y2KNET wrote:
> I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and it is using
> bind 8-2.2p7-1.
>
> Is it any security hole in this Debian 2.2r2
> and bind 8-2.2p7-1.
You can find out by looking at Debian's security page or
http://www.debian.org/security/2001/dsa-026
The ISC website says
I have installed Debian 2.2r2 and it is
using
bind 8-2.2p7-1.
Is it any security hole in this Debian
2.2r2
and bind 8-2.2p7-1.
Will appreciate any help.
Thanks.
Abu Umair
Hi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:19:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2001 18:08, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:39AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > So the question is, what attribute should I use?
> > This is the minor question IMHO.
> Not so mino
On Thursday 29 March 2001 18:08, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:39AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > So the question is, what attribute should I use?
>
> This is the minor question IMHO.
Not so minor if you want to avoid having your schema break other software you
may wa
Hi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:19:44PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 29 March 2001 18:08, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:39AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > > So the question is, what attribute should I use?
> > This is the minor question IMHO.
> Not so min
On Thursday 29 March 2001 18:08, Alexander Reelsen wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 10:03:39AM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> > So the question is, what attribute should I use?
>
> This is the minor question IMHO.
Not so minor if you want to avoid having your schema break other software you
may w
30 matches
Mail list logo
