Hi Erik,
What I have done in the past with non-bootable Windows situations was to
copy ncftp onto a boot floppy with the Linux kernel (and the proper drivers
for the network card and PCMCIA support), then do a recursive upload (put
-R *) to a Linux FTP server (or unfortunately, IIS if you have i
Hello All,
There's an Acer TravelMate here whose M$Windows was hit with an outlook
macro virus (yes, such is the fate all who use this evil mailer). I need
to save the data files and not truncate everything to 8.3 filenames.
I will try for loss less repartioning; install Linux; mount the FAT32
pa
Hi Erik,
What I have done in the past with non-bootable Windows situations was to
copy ncftp onto a boot floppy with the Linux kernel (and the proper drivers
for the network card and PCMCIA support), then do a recursive upload (put
-R *) to a Linux FTP server (or unfortunately, IIS if you have
Hello All,
There's an Acer TravelMate here whose M$Windows was hit with an outlook
macro virus (yes, such is the fate all who use this evil mailer). I need
to save the data files and not truncate everything to 8.3 filenames.
I will try for loss less repartioning; install Linux; mount the FAT32
p
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
> Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
They should appear at ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/wichert/
somewhere in the next 30 hours.
Please note that I do expect everyone who uses them to subscribe
to the va-debian-users
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
very surprised, if they decided to do so...
They don't eve
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
> >http://www.ibphoenix.com/) has multi-level transactions.
>
>
> Thanks for the info... I'll have to check that out.
>
> Anybody else have positive/negative experiences with Inter
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
> app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
very surprised, if they decided to do so...
They do
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> > I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> > environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> > system,
>
> >From what I read today,
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
system,
From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
http://www.ibphoenix.c
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
> Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
They should appear at ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/wichert/
somewhere in the next 30 hours.
Please note that I do expect everyone who uses them to subscribe
to the va-debian-users
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> system,
>From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
http://www.ibphoe
I would guess that their intention is to discourage folks from running it on
big iron Sun / IBM boxes that have the ability to run linux or linux
applications on top of another OS. I imagine they want you to pay them for
that. :)
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Przemyslaw Wegrzyn [mailto
I've used it on a couple of development boxes and it ran very well
for me. I can't comment on the stability of the product within a
production environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level
transaction system, and the speed at which it queried very convoluted
SQL statements (subselec
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 21:12:27 +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I don't.
> I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
> a little strange license:
If you're concerned about the license, why not use a
>On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
>
>> If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
>> app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
>
>Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
>very surprised, if they decided to do so...
Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
a little strange license:
"You are allowed to install and use the Software for free as long as you
operate the Software at all times only with the Open Source
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> >From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
> >http://www.ibphoenix.com/) has multi-level transactions.
>
>
> Thanks for the info... I'll have to check that out.
>
> Anybody else have positive/negative experiences with Inte
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Eric Jennings wrote:
> If only they'd open up the source completely, I'd move all of my web
> app development immediately to it from PostgreSQL/MySQL.
Me too. But I don't think it's possible in the near future. I would be
very surprised, if they decided to do so...
They d
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> > I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> > environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> > system,
>
> >From what I read today
>On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
>> I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
>> environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
>> system,
>
>From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
>http://
Hello,
I need to create a card that when scanned in a credit card scanner it
connects to my server via the phone line.
I would like to have the web server receive information like what
someone purchased, who they purchased from and record that on the
server.
This card isn't a credit card where it c
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:27:32 -0800, Eric Jennings wrote:
> I can't comment on the stability of the product within a production
> environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level transaction
> system,
>From what I read today, InterBase (which is free nowadays; see e.g.
http://www.ibpho
I would guess that their intention is to discourage folks from running it on
big iron Sun / IBM boxes that have the ability to run linux or linux
applications on top of another OS. I imagine they want you to pay them for
that. :)
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Przemyslaw Wegrzyn [mailt
I've used it on a couple of development boxes and it ran very well
for me. I can't comment on the stability of the product within a
production environment, but I was very pleased with the multi-level
transaction system, and the speed at which it queried very convoluted
SQL statements (subsele
On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 21:12:27 +0100, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote:
> Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I don't.
> I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
> a little strange license:
If you're concerned about the license, why not use
Has anyone here experience with Sybase ASE 11.0.3.3 on Linux ?
I'm wondering, if it is a good choice for production enviroment... It has
a little strange license:
"You are allowed to install and use the Software for free as long as you
operate the Software at all times only with the Open Source
Hello,
I need to create a card that when scanned in a credit card scanner it
connects to my server via the phone line.
I would like to have the web server receive information like what
someone purchased, who they purchased from and record that on the
server.
This card isn't a credit card where it
On 12 Mar 2001, David Bishop wrote:
> To follow up my own email, proftp has the exact same problem. Any other
> ideas?
>
>
Not really a idea, but I usually solve such things with strace e.g.
strace -f -p (of the daemon or inetd, if it runs from there), and
look where does it block ... I
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
> Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
I pretty much have everything ready to go. There are two bugs I would like
to fix first:
1. update-devfsd in my devfs package isn't executable. I suspect the
debian/rules
script cop
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
> Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
I pretty much have everything ready to go. There are two bugs I would like
to fix first:
1. update-devfsd in my devfs package isn't executable. I suspect the debian/rules
script cop
On 12 Mar 2001, David Bishop wrote:
> To follow up my own email, proftp has the exact same problem. Any other
> ideas?
>
>
Not really a idea, but I usually solve such things with strace e.g.
strace -f -p (of the daemon or inetd, if it runs from there), and
look where does it block ...
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:40, Neale Banks wrote:
> > I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
> > though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository for
> > such things and manage them properly...
>
> They're possibly the ones at http://people.debi
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
> > Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on
> > libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only
> > consolation here is that libsasl7 etc is also in t
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:40, Neale Banks wrote:
> > I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
> > though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository for
> > such things and manage them properly...
>
> They're possibly the ones at http://people.deb
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
> > Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on
> > libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only
> > consolation here is that libsasl7 etc is also in
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 04:49:33PM -0700, David Bishop wrote:
>
> All appropriate hosts?? Seeing as I plan on hitting this box from many
> different places (it's going to be public), and even our local machines total
> more than 300 boxes, that's not really an option... :-)
>
Sure, it's only a f
Hello Jeff
I tried it, and I can answer my own question ...
On 9 Mar 2001, at 23:26, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > I was looking at the unstable debian package for Courier,
> > courier_0.31.1-2.dsc.
> >
> > What chances are there to get this to compile on potato, or should I
> > just stick wit
38 matches
Mail list logo
