RE: Transparent firewall

2001-03-07 Thread G.Brits
* This mail has been scanned for virusses * add a line to your firewall ( or on all the firewalls ) echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward which will allow traffic to a next hop an

Transparent firewall

2001-03-07 Thread Michelle Konzack
Merhaba Listies, I have following network: Internet |89 | |/252 | |90

Re: latest postfix for potato? (was:Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 forslink)

2001-03-07 Thread Neale Banks
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote: [...] > > Any suggestions other than building all of those for potato (and no, I > > don't want to upgrade yet). > > I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them > though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repos

Re: latest postfix for potato? (was:Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 forslink)

2001-03-07 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> I'm prepared to concede defeat and upgrade the slink system to potato > (there are other motivating factors here too - things too old just become > too hard sooner or later - OTOH >400 days uptime can be strong motivation > to just "let it be"). I agree -- it is hard to upgrade a system when it

automated installs

2001-03-07 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
Does anyone know what the current state of the art in doing automated installs of new hardware with Debian is? I need to be able to write a cd-rom that I can toss into a new system, type a command, and it builds the system for me without all the various crap this gets asked for these days. I coul

Re: latest postfix for potato? (was:Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink)

2001-03-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote: > Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempting to build current BIND for > slink (separate story), I'm motivated to try to build the latest postfix > (postfix_0.0.20010228-2, which includes LDAP support) for *potato*. > > I'm prepared to concede

latest postfix for potato? (was:Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink)

2001-03-07 Thread Neale Banks
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote: [...] > I think that we need some separate projects for maintaining outdated > distributions of Debian. There's no way I'll touch slink but I have a great > need for potato to be usable with the latest stuff. Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attemptin

automated installs

2001-03-07 Thread Darren/Torin/Who Ever...
Does anyone know what the current state of the art in doing automated installs of new hardware with Debian is? I need to be able to write a cd-rom that I can toss into a new system, type a command, and it builds the system for me without all the various crap this gets asked for these days. I cou

latest postfix for potato? (was:Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink)

2001-03-07 Thread Neale Banks
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote: [...] > I think that we need some separate projects for maintaining outdated > distributions of Debian. There's no way I'll touch slink but I have a great > need for potato to be usable with the latest stuff. Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempti

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:22, I. Forbes wrote: > > Isn't there a security update for that? > > There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, > thats why I needed to recompile it. Sorry, I misread your email. My brain translates "!=woody" to "==potato". ;) > > Greppi

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote: > Isn't there a security update for that? There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, thats why I needed to recompile it. > > The compilation bombs out with the following message: > > > > make[3]: Entering di

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Wednesday 07 March 2001 17:22, I. Forbes wrote: > > Isn't there a security update for that? > > There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, > thats why I needed to recompile it. Sorry, I misread your email. My brain translates "!=woody" to "==potato". ;) > > Grepp

Re: Compiling bind_8.2.3-0 for slink

2001-03-07 Thread I. Forbes
Hello Russell On 6 Mar 2001, at 8:09, Russell Coker wrote: > Isn't there a security update for that? There is, but the update has not been released for slink, just potato, thats why I needed to recompile it. > > The compilation bombs out with the following message: > > > > make[3]: Entering d

Re: High performance filesystems ?

2001-03-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Tuesday 06 March 2001 17:58, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > ReiserFS had some fsck problems which should be fixed now, but I wouldn't > > want to bet my business on it just yet. > > What problems exactly ? Sometimes it would SEGV half way through leaving the file system in a worse state than be

Re: High performance filesystems ?

2001-03-07 Thread Russell Coker
On Tuesday 06 March 2001 17:58, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > ReiserFS had some fsck problems which should be fixed now, but I wouldn't > > want to bet my business on it just yet. > > What problems exactly ? Sometimes it would SEGV half way through leaving the file system in a worse state than b