I must agree. Netsaint is a superior system for a NOC, since you're not just
monitoring hosts, but also your network.
What's the point of knowing 50 odd hosts are down when the actual problem
lies with a switch connecting them all? I suppose you could GUESS, but why
do it when netsaint is obvious
OK, here's the picture. I have a Debian box as the SMTP gateway for
about 4000 active nodes on a class B network. Many of these machines
run sendmail, misconfigured, of course. I have MX records for the inside
machines in the DNS all pointing to the gateway, which is configured to
deny 3rd party r
Brian Johnston wrote:
>
> We use Big Brother http://www.bb4.com to monitor NT,linux,solaris... etc etc...
>
> Brian Johnston
> System Administrator
> Optigate Networks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Legend: BB = Big Brother
The problem with BB as I see it is that it is a HOST monitor, while
NetSaint is a
Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
>
> On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
>
> > atleast use SSH (OpenSSH comes to mind, released under GPL and all =) ).
>
> i would be more than fscking damn surprised. you should at least
> attempt to check before you're spreading nonsense.
Sorry, I was wrong. It's u
On Tue, 23 Jan 2001, Michael Boman wrote:
> atleast use SSH (OpenSSH comes to mind, released under GPL and all =) ).
i would be more than fscking damn surprised. you should at least
attempt to check before you're spreading nonsense.
--
[-]
So, you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
--
Does anyone have a good script that tracks click throughs to their site.
like an affiliates script?
Please email back.
- Original Message -
From: Debian Ghost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-isp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 5:16 PM
Subject: NOC scripting
> Hello De
We use Big Brother http://www.bb4.com to monitor NT,linux,solaris... etc etc...
Brian Johnston
System Administrator
Optigate Networks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 06:16 PM 1/22/01 -0500, Debian Ghost wrote:
>Hello Debian-ISPers,
>
>I work in a fairly large NOC that monitors many various systems (many
>u
Debian Ghost wrote:
>
> Hello Debian-ISPers,
>
> I work in a fairly large NOC that monitors many various systems (many
> unix). I am working on developing a survailance system that accesses the
> various systems. I plan on using debian as the OS of the survailance
> system and have installed pot
Could someone help me with the following:
The idea of this my project is to create a simple protection plan (SSL) for
virtual hosts.
If you have any ideas it would greatly be appreciated.
This virtual host protection module would not need a certificate to identify
it as a secure site, it would pr
Hello Debian-ISPers,
I work in a fairly large NOC that monitors many various systems (many
unix). I am working on developing a survailance system that accesses the
various systems. I plan on using debian as the OS of the survailance
system and have installed potato stable on a few test systems I
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 06:55:52PM +0100, Jason Quigley wrote:
> On Monday, January 22, 2001, at 06:15 PM, brian moore wrote:
> >
> > Or are you forgetting your post in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
You claimed in private mail that was 'a taste of his own medicine'.
Perhaps that is exactly what Martin
On 01-01-22 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 22:54 21.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >
> >On 01-01-21 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> Am 14:43 20.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
> >> >
> >> >On 01-01-20 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> >> >> Am 22:53 19.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian
Ashby Gochenour wrote:
> Hey Guys,
> I am not sure what this cron log is saying. Can anyone elaborate on this
> log?
>
> /etc/cron.daily/exim:
> deleted T:schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de:130.149.220.3 (too old)
There was a message sitting undeliverable in you mail queue for longer then your
exim.c
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 06:55:52PM +0100, Jason Quigley wrote:
> > Oh, and learn what the 'Mail-Followup-To:' header is for. I really
> > don't need two copies of your crap.
>
> Do I care?
Please do respect other people's mail headers whether you think
they're a "smart arse" or not.
--
Nath
On Monday, January 22, 2001, at 06:15 PM, brian moore wrote:
>
> Or are you forgetting your post in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>?
>
> > Actually, the most xenophobe's I have come across in my life are
> > English! You just have to look at all the ambassadors, otherwise
> > known as football hooli
Hey Guys,
I am not sure what this cron log is saying. Can anyone elaborate on this
log?
Thanks,
Ashby Gochenour
Network Analyist
NTELOS
/etc/cron.daily/exim:
deleted T:schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de:130.149.220.3 (too old)
I installed debian just from the 2 floppies on my alpha machine (digital
alpha server/400,old but good). The only thing needed is to use boot
floppy with kernel which has driver for the NIC...(or, pppd, if you will
be installing through ppp link :) ). It worked perfect here
On Mon, 22 Jan 200
I have been reading through the Debian install documentation, but I can't
find any reference to a FTP- or HTTP-based base set installs. But also
read a posting indicating FTP-based installations. Plus, I see that Storm
Linux (based on Debian) offers a FTP-based installation.
I don't want to use n
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Jason Quigley wrote:
> Wow, I must have struck a raw nerve!
Yes, bigotry pisses me off. I've seen enough of it in my life, and
don't need to see any more.
> On Saturday, January 20, 2001, at 09:51 PM, brian moore wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02
Wow, I must have struck a raw nerve!
On Saturday, January 20, 2001, at 09:51 PM, brian moore wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2001 at 02:01:56AM +0100, Jason Quigley wrote:
>
> Indeed, and I venture that was what Martin's point was as well. Yet you
> flamed him.
Oh, so to make the point, he decid
Am 22:54 21.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
>
>On 01-01-21 Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> Am 14:43 20.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
>> >
>> >On 01-01-20 Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> >> Am 22:53 19.01.2001 +0100 hat Christian Kurz geschrieben:
>> >> >On 01-01-19 Michelle Kon
Hi, we are currently looking for a voice email solution which will
enable our users to dial a number here, and access there email over a
normal telephone, ie the email is converted to speach and playd back to
them, they can then reply if they wish with a touch tone phone.
We are currently using
Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> Far be it for a SysAdm to interfere with another, but this beats BOFH by a
> mile. This is classic ROTFL material.
>
> You are joking, right? ;-)
I can see a few occasions when this might be useful.
Take for an example when the Computer/IT/Security policy ban the use
Far be it for a SysAdm to interfere with another, but this beats BOFH by a
mile. This is classic ROTFL material.
You are joking, right? ;-)
> I want to discourage the use of Outlook in my organization, so
> the best way is to reject the mail writhed with Outlook. The
> server
24 matches
Mail list logo
