RE: Hello.

Only 5? What I saw until now there were only programers expressing themselves I am a support guy :)). 1. "Puters" are never boring (unlike other man created jobs) 2. You have to update your knowledge on allmost daily basis 3. I am analytical I like to solve the puzzles 4. I am not

Re[2]: nat

Wouldn't that also prevent the users from using legitimate outside mail servers? -- Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, Nathan wrote: >>It's a pain in the ass to maintain an ability to track users sending spam >>from your dialups and through your server if you don't hav

Re: nat

On Sat, 07 Oct 2000, Nathan wrote: >It's a pain in the ass to maintain an ability to track users sending spam >from your dialups and through your server if you don't have each user >authenticate and the connections all apear to hit the mail server from the >firewall. > >That's what vetoed ours for

Re[2]: nat

I wasnt talking about servers, I was talking about for the end user. -- Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- > On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Kevin wrote: >> >> I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have >> if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq. >> Basic

Re: nat

On Fri, 6 Oct 2000, Kevin wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone can tell me sort of problems I would have > if I assigned internal ips to our customers and used ipmasq. > Basically I don't want to do this, but I need some sort of firepower > to persuade my boss that he doesn't want it eithe