What is the best method for benchmarking potential ISPs for an existing
website? My only concern is speed from my paid members to my website.
Initially, I looked for a a method/utility for doing remote host to
remote host packet timing. With a traffic analysis tool like ping or
trafficroute that c
> What do I need to change for them to be able to *enter*?
>
> Sven
Bootp and dhcp only use udp and always send their first request to the 'all
ones' broadcast address, AFAIK. I don't think you need the tcp rule at all.
This is the 'eth0-in' ruleset that I use to accept anything from an internal
try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> effect)
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> > Hi boys'n girls
> >
> > I have these entries in my logs:
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
-Nathan
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hi boys'n girls
>
> I have these entries in my logs:
>
> Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
> 62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68
What is the best method for benchmarking potential ISPs for an existing
website? My only concern is speed from my paid members to my website.
Initially, I looked for a a method/utility for doing remote host to
remote host packet timing. With a traffic analysis tool like ping or
trafficroute that
> What do I need to change for them to be able to *enter*?
>
> Sven
Bootp and dhcp only use udp and always send their first request to the 'all
ones' broadcast address, AFAIK. I don't think you need the tcp rule at all.
This is the 'eth0-in' ruleset that I use to accept anything from an internal
In Debian 2.2, when my computer boots up in Linux or I restart the network I
get the following:
eth1 warning, CU didn't stop.
What is the meaning of this?
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:6
try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
> What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
> effect)
>
> -Nathan
>
> On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
>
> > Hi boys'n girls
> >
> > I have these entries in my logs
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
-Nathan
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
> Hi boys'n girls
>
> I have these entries in my logs:
>
> Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
> 62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68
In Debian 2.2, when my computer boots up in Linux or I restart the network I
get the following:
eth1 warning, CU didn't stop.
What is the meaning of this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:
Does anybody have restricted screen access by PAM? How can I do this?
--
>> Serafin << \|/ Registered linux user #143543
my e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED](o o)
--ooO--(_)--Ooo---
Does anybody have restricted screen access by PAM? How can I do this?
--
>> Serafin << \|/ Registered linux user #143543
my e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED](o o)
--ooO--(_)--Ooo---
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
14 matches
Mail list logo
