Yes, that is it. Makes it much easier to build a kernel :)
Patched, building new kernel. This ought to work. Thanks to everyone
who helped on this.
Rod
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:25:25AM -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> > Finally, is there any place anyone is aware of that has the
> > configu
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:25:25AM -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> Finally, is there any place anyone is aware of that has the
> configuration used by the Debian kernel binary builders? In other
> words, the /usr/src/linux/.config from when they build the kernel?
Unless I misunderstand you, I th
The best way to answer that:
less /etc/apt/sources.list
=>
deb http://archive.debian.org/ slink main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US slink non-US
deb http://security.debian.org/ slink updates
-Francis
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Philip Bell [mailto:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:25:25AM -0500, R. W. Rodolico wrote:
> Finally, is there any place anyone is aware of that has the
> configuration used by the Debian kernel binary builders? In other
> words, the /usr/src/linux/.config from when they build the kernel?
Unless I misunderstand you, I t
The best way to answer that:
less /etc/apt/sources.list
=>
deb http://archive.debian.org/ slink main contrib non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US slink non-US
deb http://security.debian.org/ slink updates
-Francis
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Philip Bell [mailto
I asked had this problem a week ago. Many people kindly replied, and
I sorted it out. It is the 'auth' option in /etc/ppp/options.
I have forwarded the emails to your email address so as not to
clutter here.
Tom
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Christopher W. Aiken wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:3
I asked had this problem a week ago. Many people kindly replied, and
I sorted it out. It is the 'auth' option in /etc/ppp/options.
I have forwarded the emails to your email address so as not to
clutter here.
Tom
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Christopher W. Aiken wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 12:39:40AM -0700, Jacob Hunter wrote:
-|When i run Dial Up Networking on KDE a box comes up saying pppd died
unexpectedly... I have my connection configured properly to work with my ISP,
but it still says that... i even tried a different ISP...
-|anyone have any ideas?
-|
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:43:16AM +0200, Emilis wrote:
> Hi all
> I have masqueraded network
> (for example ext: 205.211.112.1 and int: 192.162.1..)
> I need to force internal users 192.162.1.. to use external proxy
> server for example 195.23.13.12:8080
> All traffic going to any:80 to 195.23.13.
Hi all
I have masqueraded network
(for example ext: 205.211.112.1 and int: 192.162.1..)
I need to force internal users 192.162.1.. to use external proxy
server for example 195.23.13.12:8080
All traffic going to any:80 to 195.23.13.12:8080
Any solutions ?
Emilis
> updates I want to quickly catch up on but my searching has been fruitless.
> Why are old distribs (hamm and slink for instance), not kept at any of the
> mirrors?
just a common sense - why keep them on mirrors?! they're outdated, that's
what we have museums for. And AFAIK slink hamm and bo are
When i run Dial Up Networking on KDE a box comes up saying pppd died
unexpectedly... I have my connection configured properly to work with my ISP,
but it still says that... i even tried a different ISP...
anyone have any ideas?
jacob
On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:43:16AM +0200, Emilis wrote:
> Hi all
> I have masqueraded network
> (for example ext: 205.211.112.1 and int: 192.162.1..)
> I need to force internal users 192.162.1.. to use external proxy
> server for example 195.23.13.12:8080
> All traffic going to any:80 to 195.23.13
Hi all
I have masqueraded network
(for example ext: 205.211.112.1 and int: 192.162.1..)
I need to force internal users 192.162.1.. to use external proxy
server for example 195.23.13.12:8080
All traffic going to any:80 to 195.23.13.12:8080
Any solutions ?
Emilis
--
To U
> updates I want to quickly catch up on but my searching has been fruitless.
> Why are old distribs (hamm and slink for instance), not kept at any of the
> mirrors?
just a common sense - why keep them on mirrors?! they're outdated, that's
what we have museums for. And AFAIK slink hamm and bo are
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Art Sackett wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 06:03:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>> Do any of you know what may have caused this message in my syslogs?
>>
>> Unusual System Events
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost su[322]: + ??? root-nobody
>>
Yes, patch is the program you use for this ;)
You can actualy run somethng like:
patch -p0 < filetopatchkernelwith.wee
That should do it, pray it applies cleanly and run a "make
mrproper" afterwards.
Second issue, the general config from Debian - not a problem. Copy it out
first (before the pa
Ok, I'll patch the [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel, and no, I will not put the 2.4
ALPHA
kernel on. This as an excuse to get a Mickeysoft person converted, and
the last thing I need is to put a kernel on that is as bad as the NT he
loves so well. :) Well, maybe not as bad, but still unreliable.
No al
Ok, I'll patch the [EMAIL PROTECTED] kernel, and no, I will not put the 2.4
ALPHA
kernel on. This as an excuse to get a Mickeysoft person converted, and
the last thing I need is to put a kernel on that is as bad as the NT he
loves so well. :) Well, maybe not as bad, but still unreliable.
No al
On Wed, 20 Sep 2000, Art Sackett wrote:
>On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 06:03:48PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hey Guys,
>> Do any of you know what may have caused this message in my syslogs?
>>
>> Unusual System Events
>> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
>> Sep 19 06:25:02 ghost su[322]: + ??? root-nobody
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
