On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> > box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> > those kinds of things.
>
>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> those kinds of things.
Are these things just malformed packets / frames sent to some machine
or
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:39:41PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> > box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> > those kinds of things.
>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:13:07PM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Maybe he means ping floods? Pings of death usually will crash a
> box after a few packets hit it. As you said Debian is good about
> those kinds of things.
Are these things just malformed packets / frames sent to some machine
or
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
> > readers in the first place?
>
> Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if y
Hi Kim,
there's an article at unixreview on vtun for virtual tunnels. There's a
vtun package in unstable. I haven't used it. Will this do what you want?
http://www.unixreview.com/administration/articles/000815sec.shtml
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Kim O wrote:
> was just wondering what the best way i
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
pipsecd
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> >
> > Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
> > readers in the first place?
>
> Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if
Hi Kim,
there's an article at unixreview on vtun for virtual tunnels. There's a
vtun package in unstable. I haven't used it. Will this do what you want?
http://www.unixreview.com/administration/articles/000815sec.shtml
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Kim O wrote:
> was just wondering what the best way
Hello Werner
No it is not that simple. Tunnelv counts its own tunnels and assigns
tap devices accordingly, but it insists on starting with "tap0", even
when that device is already being used by diald.
Diald should also work with multiple instances on the same server. I
assume it can also sor
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
pipsecd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tr
May be it's a problem of diald -- I have a production system with three
simultaneous tunnel vision vpns running on tap0, tap1 and tap2.
Werner
> -Original Message-
> From: I. Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:54 PM
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
>
Hello All
Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It
is quite neat and totally secure.
But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the
ethertap device if the kernel supports it. The bug is that both
packages insist on using the first device "tap
Hello Werner
No it is not that simple. Tunnelv counts its own tunnels and assigns
tap devices accordingly, but it insists on starting with "tap0", even
when that device is already being used by diald.
Diald should also work with multiple instances on the same server. I
assume it can also so
May be it's a problem of diald -- I have a production system with three
simultaneous tunnel vision vpns running on tap0, tap1 and tap2.
Werner
> -Original Message-
> From: I. Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject
Hello All
Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It
is quite neat and totally secure.
But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the
ethertap device if the kernel supports it. The bug is that both
packages insist on using the first device "ta
I am using Tunnel Vision (http://www.worldvisions.ca/tunnelv/) for 18 months
now. It is easy to configure and it works very reliable. And there is a
debian package "tunnelv".
Werner
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim O [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 7:42 AM
>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:58:15PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> > was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> > different places to establish a small private network over public
> > infrastructure. packages,
I am using Tunnel Vision (http://www.worldvisions.ca/tunnelv/) for 18 months
now. It is easy to configure and it works very reliable. And there is a
debian package "tunnelv".
Werner
> -Original Message-
> From: Kim O [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 7:42 AM
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
CIPE - packaged, is a kernel patch
was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
different places to establish a small private network over public
infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
thanks
Kim
21 matches
Mail list logo
