Re: reiserfs & databases.

2000-08-31 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote: >[...] >RC> The idea is that the database vendor knows their data storage >RC> better than the OS can guess it, and that knowledge allows >RC> them to implement better caching algorithms than the OS can >RC> use. The fact that benchma

RE: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Scott Thompson
Yes it was compiled into the Apache server, as well as we were using the C api for mysql. On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,4

RE: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Scott Thompson
Yes it was compiled into the Apache server, as well as we were using the C api for mysql. On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,

Re[2]: routing

2000-08-31 Thread Bulent Murtezaoglu
cog> Ok so I changed it and put the client and eth1 of the linux cog> bridge/router on a different subnet than the rest. Same cog> results. You are omitting something (obviously), maybe you should sniff the wire and tell us what you see? cheers, BM

RE: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Marco Colombo
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > 10,853,047 57,775,413,8

Re[2]: routing

2000-08-31 Thread Bulent Murtezaoglu
cog> Ok so I changed it and put the client and eth1 of the linux cog> bridge/router on a different subnet than the rest. Same cog> results. You are omitting something (obviously), maybe you should sniff the wire and tell us what you see? cheers, BM -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

RE: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Marco Colombo
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Scott Thompson wrote: > > > Some stats for you. Keep in mind that these are only for the webserver. > > Hits Bytes Visits PViews Month >8,891,404 58,798,965,869 211,007 1,528,073 Jun 2000 > 10,853,047 57,775,413,

Re[2]: routing

2000-08-31 Thread Kevin
Ok so I changed it and put the client and eth1 of the linux bridge/router on a different subnet than the rest. Same results. -- Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Original message -- > You are setting 255.255.255.0 netmasks so the machines are expecting > to find .1 .2 .3 machines on the local

Re[2]: routing

2000-08-31 Thread Kevin
Ok so I changed it and put the client and eth1 of the linux bridge/router on a different subnet than the rest. Same results. -- Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Original message -- > You are setting 255.255.255.0 netmasks so the machines are expecting > to find .1 .2 .3 machines on the local

Re: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> Which file based database system is faster than mysql? I tried Berkeley > db3 (although with transaction code) and it was horrible slow! old one is fast. hmm i thought the new one was db2, uh, some glitch in my memory files. I've seen benchmarks comparing various db-databases (gdbm, ndbm etc) a

Re: MySQL vs. Postgres

2000-08-31 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> Which file based database system is faster than mysql? I tried Berkeley > db3 (although with transaction code) and it was horrible slow! old one is fast. hmm i thought the new one was db2, uh, some glitch in my memory files. I've seen benchmarks comparing various db-databases (gdbm, ndbm etc)