>
> I have seen patchcords with a 3inch length stripped near the jack, and
> working on 10MBps. I have seen a patch panel, with the ENTIRE panel
> patched with 2' lengths of wire, nicely bundled and routed, though of
> course they had no twists with respect to each other any longer. And this
At 03:19 PM 7/25/2000 -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:43:00PM -0300, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
>
> I have read that you must ensure that the wires in the cat5 must be
> twisted all the way to the termination points to ensure reliabilty.
Except in unusually electromagnetically noisy
>
> I have seen patchcords with a 3inch length stripped near the jack, and
> working on 10MBps. I have seen a patch panel, with the ENTIRE panel
> patched with 2' lengths of wire, nicely bundled and routed, though of
> course they had no twists with respect to each other any longer. And this
At 03:19 PM 7/25/2000 -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:43:00PM -0300, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
> >
> > I have read that you must ensure that the wires in the cat5 must be
> > twisted all the way to the termination points to ensure reliabilty.
>
>Except in unusually electromagneti
Hi!
Our school uses fiber optic backbones with Fast Ethernet segments and the Video
Support Team had optimized the clips for better streaming without consuming
much bandwidth.
Sometimes, students do not need to play the video themselves, they can watch
the movie from the projector :).
Anyway,
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:23:36PM -0300, Helber wrote:
> What is the best way to conect two points at about 350 m away?
That's too far for CAT5. If you can lay fibre between the two locations,
I'd do that since it will give you the opportunity to have GigaBit Ethernet
in the future... something w
What is the best way to conect two points at about 350 m away?
When I say best I´m talking about $ and performance.
thanks.
-Mensagem Original-
De: R K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Enviada em: Terça-feira, 25 de Julho de 2000 10:14
Assunto: Re: fiber
> Generally y
Generally you just use fiber on your backbone or high traffic areas and cat5
the rest of the network. Fiber is expensive, fragile and requires skilled
personnel to install correctly. I remember sitting for almost an hour once
watching this guy carefully strip, clean and polish a section of fib
Hi!
Our school uses fiber optic backbones with Fast Ethernet segments and the Video
Support Team had optimized the clips for better streaming without consuming much
bandwidth.
Sometimes, students do not need to play the video themselves, they can watch the movie
from the projector :).
An
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:23:36PM -0300, Helber wrote:
> What is the best way to conect two points at about 350 m away?
That's too far for CAT5. If you can lay fibre between the two locations,
I'd do that since it will give you the opportunity to have GigaBit Ethernet
in the future... something
What is the best way to conect two points at about 350 m away?
When I say best I´m talking about $ and performance.
thanks.
-Mensagem Original-
De: R K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Enviada em: Terça-feira, 25 de Julho de 2000 10:14
Assunto: Re: f
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:43:00PM -0300, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
>
> I have read that you must ensure that the wires in the cat5 must be
> twisted all the way to the termination points to ensure reliabilty.
Except in unusually electromagnetically noisy environments, I've not
found any real support
Generally you just use fiber on your backbone or high traffic areas and cat5
the rest of the network. Fiber is expensive, fragile and requires skilled
personnel to install correctly. I remember sitting for almost an hour once
watching this guy carefully strip, clean and polish a section of fi
On Tue, 25 Jul 100, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
> instead of old style standard cat5 cable?
> I see lots of fiber equipment out there but 100mbps is 100mbps right?
> Is fiber economical when you get into over 100mbps situations?
>
Gigabit Ethernet and ATM are big reasons. Plus, you'll see a lot of
fibre being used for storage array networks, etc...
-db
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:29:48PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
> instead of old style standard ca
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:02:24AM -0400, B.C.J.O wrote:
> and into the user homedirectory, as it should be. =) And secondly, given
> the lockless operation, they are much much more reliable on large
> mailcluster setups where you throw the spools/homedirs into Network Attached
> Storage like that
Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
instead of old style standard cat5 cable?
I see lots of fiber equipment out there but 100mbps is 100mbps right?
Is fiber economical when you get into over 100mbps situations?
thanks.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 05:43:00PM -0300, Gerard MacNeil wrote:
>
> I have read that you must ensure that the wires in the cat5 must be
> twisted all the way to the termination points to ensure reliabilty.
Except in unusually electromagnetically noisy environments, I've not
found any real suppor
On Tue, 25 Jul 100, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
> instead of old style standard cat5 cable?
> I see lots of fiber equipment out there but 100mbps is 100mbps right?
> Is fiber economical when you get into over 100mbps situations?
>
Gigabit Ethernet and ATM are big reasons. Plus, you'll see a lot of
fibre being used for storage array networks, etc...
-db
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 04:29:48PM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
> instead of old style standard c
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 11:02:24AM -0400, B.C.J.O wrote:
> and into the user homedirectory, as it should be. =) And secondly, given
> the lockless operation, they are much much more reliable on large
> mailcluster setups where you throw the spools/homedirs into Network Attached
> Storage like tha
Can someone comment here on reasons to use fiber for network cable now
instead of old style standard cat5 cable?
I see lots of fiber equipment out there but 100mbps is 100mbps right?
Is fiber economical when you get into over 100mbps situations?
thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
I absolutely love the Mylex controllers. The AccelleRAID 150 has a 33MHz
i960 and is available in one channel w/ 4meg cache for about $400. I'd
suggest that for a small 2-drive RAID. Linux support is native, DAC960
driver.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:49:50AM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> I'm t
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I
> > can
> could you please tell me why?
> because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
> else because it supports maildir, well.. i don
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Marcin Jakubowski wrote:
> I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
> user imap and pop now, this configurations is very good but there is one
> problem.
>
> Pine can use INBOX as a ~/Maildir but when I create subdirectory in
> Nets
Give AgoraCGI a try. http://www.agoracgi.com.
Extended from commerce.cgi which itself was based on Web_Store.
Joe
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 03:02:33PM -0300, Helber wrote:
> Does anyone know a "good" free e-commerce program?
> or
> a good solution to implement a virtual store?
>
> Thank you in a
Hi, I run an HP NetServer with Debian 2.2, 2 SCSI drives attached to a
HP NetRAID-S1i (RAID 1 mode) with very good result, the HP NetRAID card
use an AMI MegaRAID chipset, and this chipset is supported by the kernel
"megaraid.c" .
On Tue, 25 Jul 100, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> I'm trying to build
I'm trying to build a system with hardware SCSI raid, any suggestions
welcome.
Its a simple system with 2 drives.
I absolutely love the Mylex controllers. The AccelleRAID 150 has a 33MHz
i960 and is available in one channel w/ 4meg cache for about $400. I'd
suggest that for a small 2-drive RAID. Linux support is native, DAC960
driver.
On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 09:49:50AM -0400, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> I'm
Hello,
I have potato with apache and pam authentication module:
ii apache 1.3.9-13.1 Versatile, high-performance HTTP
server
ii apache-common 1.3.9-13.1 Support files for all Apache
webservers
ii apache-doc 1.3.9-13.1 Apache webserver docs
ii libapache-mod-a 0
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> Hello,
>
> > I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
> could you please tell me why?
> because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
> else because it supports maildir, well.. i don't q
On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Marcin Jakubowski wrote:
> I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
> user imap and pop now, this configurations is very good but there is one
> problem.
>
> Pine can use INBOX as a ~/Maildir but when I create subdirectory in
> Net
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I
> > can
> could you please tell me why?
> because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
> else because it supports maildir, well.. i don't quite follow that
Give AgoraCGI a try. http://www.agoracgi.com.
Extended from commerce.cgi which itself was based on Web_Store.
Joe
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 03:02:33PM -0300, Helber wrote:
> Does anyone know a "good" free e-commerce program?
> or
> a good solution to implement a virtual store?
>
> Thank you in
Hello,
> I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
could you please tell me why?
because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
else because it supports maildir, well.. i don't quite follow that
argumentation, and can't see any benefits
Hi, I run an HP NetServer with Debian 2.2, 2 SCSI drives attached to a
HP NetRAID-S1i (RAID 1 mode) with very good result, the HP NetRAID card
use an AMI MegaRAID chipset, and this chipset is supported by the kernel
"megaraid.c" .
On Tue, 25 Jul 100, Allen Ahoffman wrote:
> I'm trying to buil
I'm trying to build a system with hardware SCSI raid, any suggestions
welcome.
Its a simple system with 2 drives.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I have potato with apache and pam authentication module:
ii apache 1.3.9-13.1 Versatile, high-performance HTTP
server
ii apache-common 1.3.9-13.1 Support files for all Apache
webservers
ii apache-doc 1.3.9-13.1 Apache webserver docs
ii libapache-mod-a
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
> could you please tell me why?
> because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
> else because it supports maildir, well.. i don't quite follow that
> a
Hello
I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
user imap and pop now, this configurations is very good but there is one
problem.
Pine can use INBOX as a ~/Maildir but when I create subdirectory in
Netscape, Pine can not see this, and pine folde
Hello,
> I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
could you please tell me why?
because qmail people often tell me that qmail is better than anything
else because it supports maildir, well.. i don't quite follow that
argumentation, and can't see any benefits
Hello
I swithed from /var/spool/mail to ~Maildir on my debian Potato BOX. I can
user imap and pop now, this configurations is very good but there is one
problem.
Pine can use INBOX as a ~/Maildir but when I create subdirectory in
Netscape, Pine can not see this, and pine fold
42 matches
Mail list logo
