hi,
we have a Cisco AS5200 and we're using radiusd-cistron-1.6.1
in the log file after each Auth: message
Thu Jun 22 10:01:35 2000: Auth: Login OK: [username/passwd] (from nas gateway/S20)
Thu Jun 22 10:01:35 2000: Error: Unkown Pair: Vendor-Specific
Thu Jun 22 10:01:35 2000: Error: Unkown
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
>
> noauth
>
> somewhere
Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
given the noauth option.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Robert Davidson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
noauth
somewhere
At 12:39 PM 6/22/2000 +1000, Robert Davidson wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it's not asking
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it's not asking the remote machine to
authenticate. It will allow logins with any password, any username,
etc. to log in
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
>
> noauth
>
> somewhere
Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
given the noauth option.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Robert Davidson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
noauth
somewhere
At 12:39 PM 6/22/2000 +1000, Robert Davidson wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
>and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
>
>The problem seems to be that it
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it's not asking the remote machine to
authenticate. It will allow logins with any password, any username,
etc. to log i
Fork bomb not work..
But
while (1) malloc(1000);
You must limit memoryuse
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > > root$ man ulimit
> > Isn't this a bash shell level thing?
> > % ulimit
> > ulimit: Command not found.
>
> > So what happens when you have users using tcsh? ulimit is
> > root$ man ulimit
> Isn't this a bash shell level thing?
> % ulimit
> ulimit: Command not found.
> So what happens when you have users using tcsh? ulimit is not available in
limit [-h] [resource [maximum-use]]
> tcsh. Can't users also change their ulimit settings? What about preventing
Run the follow test:
cat /proc/pci | less
Try to find your ethernet entry.
If you not find ethernet information in /proc/pci your card have a
problem...
You can compile a monolitic kernel width ne2k-pci support. If your
ethernet card work the kernel
detect automaticaly your interface.
Fork bomb not work..
But
while (1) malloc(1000);
You must limit memoryuse
Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
> > > root$ man ulimit
> > Isn't this a bash shell level thing?
> > % ulimit
> > ulimit: Command not found.
>
> > So what happens when you have users using tcsh? ulimit i
> > root$ man ulimit
> Isn't this a bash shell level thing?
> % ulimit
> ulimit: Command not found.
> So what happens when you have users using tcsh? ulimit is not available in
limit [-h] [resource [maximum-use]]
> tcsh. Can't users also change their ulimit settings? What about preventin
Run the follow test:
cat /proc/pci | less
Try to find your ethernet entry.
If you not find ethernet information in /proc/pci your card have a
problem...
You can compile a monolitic kernel width ne2k-pci support. If your
ethernet card work the kernel
detect automaticaly your interface.
Are we talking about the 'TCP 3-way handshake'?
--
Kevin Blackham 801-539-0852
[EMAIL PROTECTED]877-964-7746
XMission Internet, Salt Lake City, Utah
On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 09:47:25PM -0400, Chris Wagner wr
14 matches
Mail list logo
