Re: tcp connection

At 10:48 PM 6/16/00 -0500, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: >Sockets? Butyou would definitely have seen this more than a couple of >times. No, not sockets, sockets are way down on the stack. This is the protocol that says what the octets mean and do. It's the common thread among all the high level protocol

Re: tcp connection

On Sat, 17 Jun 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: > At 10:48 PM 6/16/00 -0500, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > >Sockets? Butyou would definitely have seen this more than a couple of > >times. > > No, not sockets, sockets are way down on the stack. This is the protocol > that says what the octets mean and do.

Re: tcp connection

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: > Hola. What is the official name of the type of connection that the common > network protocols use? It lives somewhere above the tcp layer and below the > app layer but is so obscure that I can't find it. e.g. Telnet, ftp, http, > etc. all establish

tcp connection

Hola. What is the official name of the type of connection that the common network protocols use? It lives somewhere above the tcp layer and below the app layer but is so obscure that I can't find it. e.g. Telnet, ftp, http, etc. all establish an x type connection and then transmit their dat

Re: tcp connection

On Sat, Jun 17, 2000 at 12:43:45AM -0400, Chris Wagner wrote: > At 10:48 PM 6/16/00 -0500, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: > >Sockets? Butyou would definitely have seen this more than a couple of > >times. > > No, not sockets, sockets are way down on the stack. This is the protocol > that says what the oc

Re: tcp connection

At 10:48 PM 6/16/00 -0500, Sanjeev Gupta wrote: >Sockets? Butyou would definitely have seen this more than a couple of >times. No, not sockets, sockets are way down on the stack. This is the protocol that says what the octets mean and do. It's the common thread among all the high level protoco

Re: tcp connection

On Fri, 16 Jun 2000, Chris Wagner wrote: > Hola. What is the official name of the type of connection that the common > network protocols use? It lives somewhere above the tcp layer and below the > app layer but is so obscure that I can't find it. e.g. Telnet, ftp, http, > etc. all establish

tcp connection

Hola. What is the official name of the type of connection that the common network protocols use? It lives somewhere above the tcp layer and below the app layer but is so obscure that I can't find it. e.g. Telnet, ftp, http, etc. all establish an x type connection and then transmit their da

blocking a bouncer

I'm not a computer professional but I run some Email lists using Listar on a debian hamm machine (I've never had time or felt the need to upgrade) and things have run fine for some years but now I've got a bouncer. I've blocked him with listar but I'm still getting a bounce to me as admin. eve

blocking a bouncer

I'm not a computer professional but I run some Email lists using Listar on a debian hamm machine (I've never had time or felt the need to upgrade) and things have run fine for some years but now I've got a bouncer. I've blocked him with listar but I'm still getting a bounce to me as admin. ev

controlling user resources

hello, maybe someone knows a good solutions for global(not for one sesion) controling users resources..limiting cpu, ram, proc and/or smth... - Kasparavicius Andrius ___

controlling user resources

hello, maybe someone knows a good solutions for global(not for one sesion) controling users resources..limiting cpu, ram, proc and/or smth... - Kasparavicius Andrius __

PAM (?) and anonymous CVS with SSH problem (Was: Problem accessing your CVS repo of Java Autoconf macros

I manage an anonymous CVS server (its user's guide is ), using SSH, as described in: http://kitenet.net/programs/sshcvs/ It worked in 'slink' and fails with 'potato' (because of PAM, I assume). The message I get in the server's logs is: Ju

PAM (?) and anonymous CVS with SSH problem (Was: Problem accessing your CVS repo of Java Autoconf macros

I manage an anonymous CVS server (its user's guide is ), using SSH, as described in: http://kitenet.net/programs/sshcvs/ It worked in 'slink' and fails with 'potato' (because of PAM, I assume). The message I get in the server's logs is: J