Hi Helge!
On 01/12/2014 10:36 PM, Helge Deller wrote:
>> Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad to see the HPPA port coming
>> back to life. I'd love to test it myself, but the only PA-RISC machine
>> that I currently know of which is in my vicinity is located inside a
>> laboratory at my physi
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 22:48 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> 2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
> >
> > Sorry, I'm being silly. udev is built as part of systemd now, so this
> > is independent of whether you use systemd as init. And systemd doesn't
> > currently run as init in the initramfs.
>
> Uh, OK.
>
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
>
> Sorry, I'm being silly. udev is built as part of systemd now, so this
> is independent of whether you use systemd as init. And systemd doesn't
> currently run as init in the initramfs.
Uh, OK.
How can I help further?
Emeric
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debi
Hi Adrian,
On 01/12/2014 05:32 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:37:52PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
>> as you might have noticed, we did huge progress on the HPPA (PA-RISC) port:
>> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/
>
> Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 22:30 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> 2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
> >
> > You can have sysvinit and systemd installed in parallel and then use the
> > 'init' kernel parameter to switch between them. Only systemd-sysv
> > conflicts/replaces sysvinit.
>
> So, I've reinstalled sy
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
>
> You can have sysvinit and systemd installed in parallel and then use the
> 'init' kernel parameter to switch between them. Only systemd-sysv
> conflicts/replaces sysvinit.
So, I've reinstalled sysvinit and sysvinit-core that purged
systemd-sysv. I can't however remov
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 21:16 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> 2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
> >
> > So this is a crash, not an incompatibility with the newer systemd.
>
> [...]
>
> > Can you test the 3.2 kernel with sysvinit, in case this is a bug that's
> > specifically provoked by systemd?
>
> That'
2014/1/12 Ben Hutchings :
>
> So this is a crash, not an incompatibility with the newer systemd.
[...]
> Can you test the 3.2 kernel with sysvinit, in case this is a bug that's
> specifically provoked by systemd?
That's why I was saying "too old for my current Debian install" on Jan 6th.
Since
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 19:15 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> 2014/1/7 Ben Hutchings :
> > On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:15 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand that - I still have 3.2 installed on this unstable
> > (i386) system and can still boot it. How does it go wrong?
>
> It s
2014/1/7 Ben Hutchings :
> On Mon, 2014-01-06 at 10:15 +0100, Émeric MASCHINO wrote:
>
> I don't understand that - I still have 3.2 installed on this unstable
> (i386) system and can still boot it. How does it go wrong?
It seems to crash with something wrong with systemd.
You're getting in loop
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 7:23 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> gcc-4.9 is uploaded to experimental, asking the porters to watch for build
> failures and corresponding patches. See
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gcc-4.9&suite=experimental
>
> These are already fixed in the vcs.
>
> -
Hello Helge!
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:37:52PM +0100, Helge Deller wrote:
> as you might have noticed, we did huge progress on the HPPA (PA-RISC) port:
> http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/
Indeed. Congratulations on that! I'm glad to see the HPPA port coming
back to life. I'd love to test it
Am 16.12.2013 11:34, schrieb Matthias Klose:
> Package: java-common
> Version: 0.50
> Severity: serious
> Tags: jessie, sid
>
> openjdk-7 currently ftbfs on sparc, sparc64, s390, kfreebsd-any. So please
> either remove the default-* packages on these archs, or fall back to gcj.
>
> - the hotspot
13 matches
Mail list logo
