? I
don't really care which, but whatever we use, it should be consistent.
[Or at least, consistent within a single blurb.]
Don Armstrong
--
I shall require that [a scientific system's] logical form shall be
such that it can be singled out, by means of emperical tests, in a
negativ
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Don Armstrong (d...@debian.org):
> > On Fri, 09 Apr 2010, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> > > It seems to me, that the current issue of the Debian Project News
> > > should now be frozen content wise. Pl
ing one, like reporting bugs, filing
patches, fixing documentation, discussing technical solutions,
maintaining packages, and flaming on mailing lists...
Don Armstrong
--
If you have the slightest bit of intellectual integrity you cannot
support the government. -- anonymous
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
n
Developers as, so the NM process needs to use the same terminology.
Don Armstrong
--
Debian's not really about the users or the software at all. It's a
large flame-generating engine that the cabal uses to heat their coffee
-- Andrew Suffield (#debian-devel Fri, 1
oding otherwise is just going to lead to even more
confusion than we have currently.]
Don Armstrong
--
The beauty of the DRUNKENNESS subprogram was that you could move your
intoxication level up and down at will, instead of being caught on a
relentless down escalator to bargain basement phi
7;t cutting the mustard would also be helpful too; and if
you really want to make my life easier, write up a description of the
pseudopackage. [http://www.debian.org/Bugs/pseudo-packages]
Don Armstrong
--
If you have the slightest bit of intellectual integrity you cannot
support the government. -- a
; translated package descriptions?
I don't have a problem with the BTS being used, but it needs buy in from
the people actually doing the translation(s).
If a psuedopackage works, we can configure that.
--
Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com
7 matches
Mail list logo
