On 4/4/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Eddy_Petri=BAor?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I am sure Christian ment somethign along the lines of:
> >
> > Javier and myself and they perfectly know
> > we do not push for English as the universal language: we just live
> > with the fac
"=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Eddy_Petri=BAor?=" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On 4/4/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "=3D?ISO-8859-2?Q?Eddy_Petri=3DBAor?=3D" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > [..] do not push for English as the universal language: we just live
> > > with the fact that is mostly used in international
On 4 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill spake thusly:
>
>> The problem is more one of 'how do we identify those people that
>> aren't a Developer, but that do contribute regularly'.
>
> There are a number of ways of doing this although, like NM, it's
> ultimately a human process that is carried out in the
On 4 Apr 2006, Benj. Mako Hill stated:
>
>> Most developers seem to agree that there are bugs in our process
>> for integrating new members into the project, but that's not the
>> same as saying that non-DDs should be allowed to vote
>
> Clearly not.
>
>> voting rights are one of the few privileg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 04.04.2006 um 09:58 schrieb Eddy Petrişor:
So you need evidence that English is used in many cases when two
speakers of different languages meet andd have no other common ground
language?
I they have no other common ground language... Many hav
Quoting Jutta Wrage ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I would prefer "English as a universal lanhguage?" - note the
> question mark.
This is what Javier and I did put in the last version of the paper, on
a sugegstion of mine (in case some doubted my own commitment in that
areaI neglected answering MJ
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Now, if there are people like that who are not DD's, the
> question we must ask, is wjy are they not DD's? If they are putting
> in the work, and have the same commitment as a DD does, even if they
> do not package stuff, why is the project not tre
On 2006/04/05, at 15:27, MJ Ray wrote:
"The Debian New Maintainer process is a series of required
proceedings to become a Debian Developer."
-- http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
Or is the above statement false? It seems to disagree with the
constitution section 3.2.1 "Developers are vo
8 matches
Mail list logo
