Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Martin Quinson
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:31:17AM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > So, what do you guys think ? > > > > To sum up my point, the best solution would be that translators become the > > same status inside Debian than maintainers. >

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Michael Bramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:56:54AM +0100, Martin Quinson wrote: > > the user can use apt pining to avoid some languages. > > > > The i10n packages have real package maintainers, we have a real > > BTS-package. Also we can make new i10n packages, without any delay from > > the bin package maintaine

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Michael Bramer
> > > Proposed solutions which does not work well IMHO: > > > - keep as we are: bugs are repported against the package containing it: > > > every translation team have to have the needed manpower to monitor > > > *all* > > > bugs submitted against *all* Debian package. > > > - keep as

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Pierre Machard
Hi, On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:31:17AM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote: [...] > The i10n packages have real package maintainers, we have a real > BTS-package. Also we can make new i10n packages, without any delay from > the bin package maintainer. I would like to insist on the difficulies to join th

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Denis Barbier
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:15:07PM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote: [...] > > What kind of debconf templates are you translating? The ddtp page is not > > clear about that, and I seem to remember that you still translate debconf > > templates of the old generation, ie, the ones handled by debconf-utils

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Michael Bramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 06:00:36PM +0100, Pierre Machard wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:31:17AM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote: > [...] > > The i10n packages have real package maintainers, we have a real > > BTS-package. Also we can make new i10n packages, without any delay from > > the bin packa

Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french

2003-02-13 Thread Michael Bramer
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 09:09:58PM +0100, Denis Barbier wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:15:07PM +0100, Michael Bramer wrote: > [...] > > > What kind of debconf templates are you translating? The ddtp page is not > > > clear about that, and I seem to remember that you still translate debconf > >