On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 08:01:11PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> Which includes the Chinese and Japenese, who need the characters found
> in the Supplementary Ideographic Planes, which means 4 byte characters.
Afaik UTF8 is not able to encode 32bit unicode? I thought this is because
the "living" l
Bernd Eckenfels writes:
> Afaik UTF8 is not able to encode 32bit unicode? I thought this is because
> the "living" languages are all restricted to 16bit? Hmm... i might be wrong.
> Does that mean Java does not support asian languages with its 16bit Unicode?
UTF-8 can be used encode UCS-4.
> As I
On Sun, Nov 19, 2000 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 08:01:11PM -0600, David Starner wrote:
> > Which includes the Chinese and Japenese, who need the characters found
> > in the Supplementary Ideographic Planes, which means 4 byte characters.
>
> Afaik UTF8 is
Hi,
At Sun, 19 Nov 2000 22:50:54 +0100,
Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Afaik UTF8 is not able to encode 32bit unicode?
Strictly speaking, there is no 32bit unicode. UCS-4 character set
has 31bit code space, not 32bit. UTF-8 can encode the whole UCS-4.
> I thought this is becaus
4 matches
Mail list logo