Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> However, I am interested in how Groff 1.16 works for UTF-8 input. > I could not find any code for UTF-8 input, though I found a code for > UTF-8 output in src/devices/grotty/tty.cc . Am I missing something? > (Of course /font/devutf8/* has no implementation of UTF-8 encoding, > though it seems

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > Well, maybe. But sometimes there is kerning. Please consult Ken > > Lunde's `CJKV Information Processing' for details. Example: > > > >〇 > >一 > >〇 > > Wow! This is the first time I received a Japanese mail from > non-Japanese sp

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-22 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> 2. Perhaps it is a good point of view to see troff (gtroff) as an > engine which handles _glyphs_, not characters, in a given context of > typographic style and layout. The current glyph is defined by the > current point size, the current font, and the name of the > "character" which is to be re

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-22 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Sat, 21 Oct 2000 10:46:51 +0200 (CEST), Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In general. I want to define terms completely independent on any > particular program. We have > > character set > character encoding > glyph set > glyph encoding I understand. Since we are dis