Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Wed, 18 Oct 2000 16:54:53 +0200 (CEST), Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, thank you for explaining glyph. I also understand you > > understand problems on Japanese character codes well. > Well, I'm the author of the CJK package for LaTeX, I've written a > ttf2pk con

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> JIS X 0213 has many characters which are also included in JIS X 0212. > It is very confusing. I guess JIS people think JIS X 0212 is > obsolete. Basically, only Emacs supports JIS X 0212... > A few characters in JIS X 0213 are not included in the present > Unicode. AFAIK, this will be fixed

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread CHOI Junho
> "TK" == Tomohiro KUBOTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Right. I think I've answered this problem in my last mail (regarding > a `glyphclass' directive in font description files). TK> Then all of these glyphs have to have the same width. Fortunately, TK> CJK ideograms and

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:40:35 +0200 (CEST), Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that such an encoding request has to determine the encoding *and* > character set of a document (similar to Emacs). (snip) > Examples: > .\" -*- charset: JIS-X-0208; encoding: EUC -*- > .\" -*- cha

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> Hanguls are usually treated as fixed-width, but it is not true. Many > Korean wordprocessor supports proportional Hangul fonts, and even > Korean Windows (9X/ME/2000) have proportional Hangul TrueType fonts > in default (e.g. Gulim. Gulim has one more variation, Gulim-che; it > is fixed-width f

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Werner LEMBERG
> > Note that such an encoding request has to determine the encoding *and* > > character set of a document (similar to Emacs). > (snip) > > Examples: > > .\" -*- charset: JIS-X-0208; encoding: EUC -*- > > .\" -*- charset: JIS-X-0208; encoding: ISO-2022 -*- > > No. only specifying 'encoding' i

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:15:02 +0200 (CEST), Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The same exists for Japanese and Chinese, especially for vertical > writing. I think *ideograms* have fixed width everywhere. Of course CJK languages have their own non-letter symbols which sometimes don'

Re: [Groff] Re: groff: radical re-implementation

2000-10-19 Thread Tomohiro KUBOTA
Hi, At Thu, 19 Oct 2000 22:12:07 +0200 (CEST), Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is not true. Encoding does *not* imply the character set. > You are talking about charset/encoding tags. Hmm, I cannot understand your idea... In Emacs, charsets such as ISO8859-1, JISX0208.1990, an