Re: dpkg i18n and gettext

1998-11-02 Thread Ian Jackson
Martin Schulze writes ("Re: dpkg i18n and gettext"): > Ian Jackson wrote: > > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system, > > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I > > agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets). > > *sigh* ? You do

Re: dpkg i18n and gettext

1998-11-02 Thread Martin Schulze
Ian Jackson wrote: > > > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system, > > > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I > > > agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets). > > > > *sigh* > > ? You don't like reorganisation ? Well, not real

Re: dpkg i18n and gettext

1998-11-02 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Ian Jackson wrote: > Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's > build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this > I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets. Well, I don't know much about catgets but gettext manual say

Re: dpkg i18n and gettext

1998-11-02 Thread Luis Francisco Gonzalez
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's > build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this > I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets. > > Obviously we can convert old translation files, but I was wondering if > the people here had any