On Nov 02, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Question: Does catgets have also .po files and msgmerge?
>If not, I think this would be a bad idea from the translator's point of view.
I agree. msgmerge is VERY important for the translator.
--
ciao,
Marco
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this
> I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets.
>
> Obviously we can convert old translation files, but I was wondering if
> the people here had any
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this
> I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets.
Well, I don't know much about catgets but gettext manual say
Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> > > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> > > agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets).
> >
> > *sigh*
>
> ? You don't like reorganisation ?
Well, not real
Martin Schulze writes ("Re: dpkg i18n and gettext"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> > agree with gettext's de
Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets).
*sigh*
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> b
I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets).
Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
build system to look more like the way
7 matches
Mail list logo
