On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:06:20PM +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> On 06/11/2006, at 9:08 AM, Jens Seidel wrote:
> >Thanks to Daniel, debiandoc-sgml supports now (soon) Swedish as well.
> >
> >The following languages are currently supported. If you want to add
> >a new language, please adapt the att
On 06/11/2006, at 9:08 AM, Jens Seidel wrote:
Thanks to Daniel, debiandoc-sgml supports now (soon) Swedish as well.
The following languages are currently supported. If you want to add
a new language, please adapt the attached files.
So my language isn't supported, either. :(
I'm willing to
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 08:17:45PM +0100, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:51:50PM +0100, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> > debiandoc2html -c -l sv release-notes.sv.sgml
> > Warning: locale 'sv' not supported, using en_US.ISO8859-1
>
> That's right: locale 'sv' is not supported. Is this yo
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 12:51:50PM +0100, Daniel Nylander wrote:
> I do seem to have some issues with compiling the Release Notes.
>
> Is this something that is known or is it just me being silly?
>
> $ make architecture=i386
> rm -f ../dynamic.ent
> ln -s dynamic_i386.ent ../dynamic.ent
> po4a-t
A few notes from my experience, hopefully also useful for fellow
translators who are not very familiar with the debian-doc working flow.
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:44:27AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
>
> See [1] for general information on how to get a checkout from the DDP CVS.
> * To get an anonymou
Greetings,
I do seem to have some issues with compiling the Release Notes.
Is this something that is known or is it just me being silly?
$ make architecture=i386
rm -f ../dynamic.ent
ln -s dynamic_i386.ent ../dynamic.ent
po4a-translate -k 0 -f sgml -m ../en/release-notes.en.sgml \
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 05:44:27AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> Hello again,
Hi Frans,
> When you have updated your translation to the current version, please send
> a request to the debian-doc list to enable it. We will then check if it
> builds correctly and, if it does, enable it.
I have updat
Clytie Siddall writes:
> Stephen, thanks for your reply. :)
Always glad to be of help! Especially when it's this easy. :)
Regards,
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your reply, Jens. :)
On 02/11/2006, at 10:42 PM, Jens Seidel wrote:
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:58:59PM +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.8 on an Intel MacBook. :)
Maybe you could connect to a different computer via network. An
available public machine is for ex
Stephen, thanks for your reply. :)
On 03/11/2006, at 12:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Clytie Siddall writes:
Fink doesn't list it. Fink is our main packaging system, using apt
and dpkg. ;)
Try asking apt for OpenSP, from the OpenJade project. I'm not sure
why they forked from JJ Clark's
Clytie Siddall writes:
> Fink doesn't list it. Fink is our main packaging system, using apt
> and dpkg. ;)
Try asking apt for OpenSP, from the OpenJade project. I'm not sure
why they forked from JJ Clark's line, but it doesn't look like an
excessively hostile fork, at least. So it's probabl
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:58:59PM +1030, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> >>I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.8 on an Intel MacBook. :)
Maybe you could connect to a different computer via network. An
available public machine is for example shell.alioth.debian.org.
Virtualisation is maybe another option. Bochs (emu
Thanks again for your help, Frans. :)
On 02/11/2006, at 11:40 AM, Frans Pop wrote:
I'm running Mac OSX 10.4.8 on an Intel MacBook. :)
That might indeed affect the way something is built, especially if
the process assumes a Debian system. Maybe I can just get a copy of
the English POT file? I
On Thursday 02 November 2006 08:44, Jens Seidel wrote:
> Any reason why you named the file release-notes.vi.po? The Makefile
> assumes vi.po (directory name is the stem).
The reason is that 'make update-po' created it that way.
Cheers,
FJP
pgps2HJ1EwYxy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 02:10:20AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> In the mean time I have committed an initial PO file for vi in CVS, so if
Any reason why you named the file release-notes.vi.po? The Makefile
assumes vi.po (directory name is the stem).
>Added files:
>manuals.sgml/release-notes
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 08:38, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> I thought I might hang on to it, as I hope to do more docs
> translation in the future. I have the room, now I've upgraded, so I
> don't mind having the whole tree.
Sure. Just wanted to let you know it is not needed for the Release Notes
Thanks for your quick response, Frans. :)
On 01/11/2006, at 5:18 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 07:15, Clytie Siddall wrote:
The output and error while running the command:
___
Pearl:~/Vietnamese/Main_Projects/Debian/documentation/release-notes/
ddp/manuals.sgml/release-not
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 07:15, Clytie Siddall wrote:
> The output and error while running the command:
> ___
> Pearl:~/Vietnamese/Main_Projects/Debian/documentation/release-notes/
> ddp/manuals.sgml/release-notes/vi clytie$ make update-po
Hmm. Looks like you checked out the whole Debian Docu
On 01/11/2006, at 3:14 PM, Frans Pop wrote:
Thanks to all the translators who have responded to the last mail.
We are
now ready to really begin work.
I checked out the module, created /vi and copied the en/Makefile into
it. Then I ran "make update-po".
This will not run if your path co
Hello again,
Thanks to all the translators who have responded to the last mail. We are
now ready to really begin work.
So far most of what has been done is removing all irrelevant text from the
Sarge release and some, relatively minor, updates for Etch. So a lot of
information still needs to b
20 matches
Mail list logo
