Hello,
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 02:42:08PM +0300, Esko Arajärvi wrote:
> On Friday 09 May 2008, Nicolas François wrote:
> > I can take another approach, and prompt for the deadline if the maintainer
> > did not specify any deadline (on the command line or in his config file),
> > and if he did not e
Hi,
On Friday 09 May 2008, Nicolas François wrote:
> I can take another approach, and prompt for the deadline if the maintainer
> did not specify any deadline (on the command line or in his config file),
> and if he did not explicitly request a message with no deadlines (on the
> command line or
Hi,
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 09:55:25AM +0300, Esko Arajärvi wrote:
>
> As a translator I of course like deadlines, but if there is some default, the
> package maintainer should be aware of it also. Would they know about it
> without reading the documentation? Is it shown and easily changed whe
Hi,
On Thursday 08 May 2008, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> Hello Nicolas,
>
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> > Should --deadline be a default option too?
> > or Should --deadline without argument default to $(LC_ALL=C date -R -d
> > +10days) I could also make --de
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 10:50:12PM +0200, Jens Seidel wrote:
> On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> > No, changing the default makes sense. Thanks.
> >
> > I will make --languageteam the default.
>
> What about detecting whether the PO file is a debconf based PO fil
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> No, changing the default makes sense. Thanks.
>
> I will make --languageteam the default.
What about detecting whether the PO file is a debconf based PO file
or not and using the corresponding option (which I currently do not
rem
Hello Nicolas,
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:41:39PM +0200, Nicolas François wrote:
> Should --deadline be a default option too?
> or Should --deadline without argument default to $(LC_ALL=C date -R -d
> +10days)
> I could also make --deadline argument to be passed to date -d.
I am in favor of this.
Hi,
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 05:12:08PM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Nicolas François:
> > There has been recently a few threads about a recommended usage for
> > podebconf-report-po, so I plan to add an EXAMPLES sect
Hi!
Am Donnerstag, den 08.05.2008, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Nicolas François:
> There has been recently a few threads about a recommended usage for
> podebconf-report-po, so I plan to add an EXAMPLES section in its manpage.
I wonder, wouldn't it be convenient to have podebcon
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:22:23PM +0100, ardoRic wrote:
> Hello,
>
> You seem to have forgotten the attachment.
Thanks. Here it is.
I also fixed a typo (s/--with-translators/--withtranslators/)
Best Regards,
--
Nekral
EEXXAAMMPPLLEESS
ddeebbccoonnff tteemmppllaatt
has been recently a few threads about a recommended usage for
> podebconf-report-po, so I plan to add an EXAMPLES section in its manpage.
>
> Here is the current version that you can review (a formatted version, to
> be used with less -R, is attached):
>
> EXAMPLES
> debconf tem
Hello,
podebconf-report-po is more and more advertised and used, which are both
good things.
There has been recently a few threads about a recommended usage for
podebconf-report-po, so I plan to add an EXAMPLES section in its manpage.
Here is the current version that you can review (a formatted
12 matches
Mail list logo
