On Nov 02, Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Question: Does catgets have also .po files and msgmerge?
>If not, I think this would be a bad idea from the translator's point of view.
I agree. msgmerge is VERY important for the translator.
--
ciao,
Marco
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this
> I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets.
>
> Obviously we can convert old translation files, but I was wondering if
> the people here had any
On Sun, 1 Nov 1998, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> build system to look more like the way it used to. As part of this
> I'm considering dropping gettext in favour of catgets.
Well, I don't know much about catgets but gettext manual say
Ian Jackson wrote:
> > > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> > > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> > > agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets).
> >
> > *sigh*
>
> ? You don't like reorganisation ?
Well, not real
Martin Schulze writes ("Re: dpkg i18n and gettext"):
> Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> > including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> > agree with gettext's de
Ian Jackson wrote:
> I'm rather unimpressed with the current state of dpkg's build system,
> including the i18n stuff. I'm also unimpressed by GNU gettext (I
> agree with gettext's detractors in favour of catgets).
*sigh*
> Over the next weeks and months I expect to be un-reorganising dpkg's
> b
6 matches
Mail list logo
