Re: DPN 2015/01 frozen. Please review and translate.

2015-02-14 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > "Currently, more than 83% of all the source packages in the main archive of > the unstable distribution can be _build_ reproducibl_e_." Actually: "Currently, more than 83% of all the source packages in the main archive of the unstable di

Re: DPN 2015/01 frozen. Please review and translate.

2015-02-14 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, thanks for DPN and for including a paragraph about reproducible builds! Two comments about that paragraph: "Currently, more than 83% of all the source packages in the main archive of the unstable distribution can be reproducibly." -> "Currently, more than 83% of all the source packages

Re: DPN 2015/01 frozen. Please review and translate.

2015-02-13 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Richard Hartmann [2015-02-14 00:19 +0100]: > > The DPN was in fact frozen not deeply enough, and we added a few more > > content (sorry, that's my fault). > > For either this or next edition: DebConf16 will happen in Cape Town. Can we get the story in this time or would you prefer w

Re: DPN 2015/01 frozen. Please review and translate.

2015-02-13 Thread Richard Hartmann
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Cédric Boutillier wrote: > The DPN was in fact frozen not deeply enough, and we added a few more > content (sorry, that's my fault). For either this or next edition: DebConf16 will happen in Cape Town. Richard -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...

Re: DPN 2015/01 frozen. Please review and translate.

2015-02-13 Thread Cédric Boutillier
Hi! On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 01:33:33PM -0500, Donald Norwood wrote: > [ Please reply on -publicity list ] > Hi all, > We just finished the last bits of the > new issue of DPN to be released on Monday, February 16, around 19:45 UTC. > We would very much appreciate reviews and translations. The D