On 22/12/2005, at 11:26 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
My current files:
apt 2005/09/13
dpkg 2005/09/06
I can't find any trace of a vi.po bug report for dpkg
Your mail made me check translations which I may have forgotten for
dpkg -and I'll do so for apt- but I find no Vietname
> My current files:
>
> apt 2005/09/13
> dpkg 2005/09/06
I can't find any trace of a vi.po bug report for dpkg
Your mail made me check translations which I may have forgotten for
dpkg -and I'll do so for apt- but I find no Vietnamese update for
dpkg...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
On 22/12/2005, at 9:48 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
pppconfig: no news from John Hasler, despite recent mails...
:(
Current file dated 2005/05/06.
dpkg: seems that I may have missed the update.
apt: ditto
I'll do a wide review of updates I may have missed for dpkg and apt
My current fi
> >>I've noticed that D-I files completely translated into my language
> >>many months ago are STILL listed as "missing". What do we have to do
> >>to get them logged?
> >
>
> >Which ones?
>
> pppconfig, dpkg and apt.
pppconfig: no news from John Hasler, despite recent mails...
dpkg: seems tha
On 21/12/2005, at 6:28 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
Vietnamese is not mentioned in the official announcement because
2nd stage is completely unreadable due to a localechooser bug
which was discovered too late. It is "supported", though.
What does this mean for users? Has the bug been fixed?
> > Vietnamese is not mentioned in the official announcement because
> > 2nd stage is completely unreadable due to a localechooser bug
> > which was discovered too late. It is "supported", though.
>
> What does this mean for users? Has the bug been fixed? Is a working
> Vietnamese installer? Wi
I know I'm catching this mail late, so I hope the situation has been
resolved.
On 13/11/2005, at 6:28 PM, Christian Perrier wrote:
-We now officially support 51 languages including English, plus 3
languages which we support only in the alpha "graphical" installer
Vietnamese is not mentione
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 06:41:58AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Definitely, but it has been added to CVS trunk and fedora-branch, but
> > not
> > to the glibc 2.3 branch, so it is not part of latest official tarballs
> >
Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
>
> Definitely, but it has been added to CVS trunk and fedora-branch, but not
> to the glibc 2.3 branch, so it is not part of latest official tarballs
> and some distributions will miss it.
>
>
> What does that mean? What is CVS trun
Hi,Definitely, but it has been added to CVS trunk and fedora-branch, but not
to the glibc 2.3 branch, so it is not part of latest official tarballsand some distributions will miss it.What does that mean? What is CVS trunk?Erdal
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Erdal Ronahi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the "ku" locale has been included into glibc recently, as far as I can see
> from this:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=870#c2
>
> I am not sure, but this should help?
Definitely, but it has been added to
> The bug is fixed in the experimental version of newt (0.52.1-1). You can see
> the fixed-in-experimental tag
> in the BTS.
>
> The new version of newt changes the SONAME but otherwise is API-identical to
> the one in debian
> (its the redhat version catching up with the Debian changes). I can ma
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So far, I haven't seen ku translations for base-config, shadow,
console-data...only iso-codes, afaik.
At least newt is completely translated and filed as a bug, but does not show up
here.
Well,
Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> So far, I haven't seen ku translations for base-config, shadow,
> console-data...only iso-codes, afaik.
>
>
> At least newt is completely translated and filed as a bug, but does not show
> up
> here.
Well, this is because the newt package
So far, I haven't seen ku translations for base-config, shadow,console-data...only iso-codes, afaik.
At least newt is completely translated and filed as a bug, but does not show up here.Erdal
Hi,the "ku" locale has been included into glibc recently, as far as I can see from this:http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=870#c2
I am not sure, but this should help?Greetings,Erdal2005/11/15, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):> Hi,>> what "
Quoting Erdal Ronahi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Hi,
>
> what "minor" problems does Kurdish have?
Missing locale in 2nd stage.
Kurdish is currently supported in the alternative locale package named
"belocs-locales-*".
However, as this package is not of Priority: standard, it can't be
installed durin
> I was looking at the status page for level 2 Kurdish, which showed all the
> files as "missing", though a lot of the strings are translated.
Hmmm, which ones?
So far, I haven't seen ku translations for base-config, shadow,
console-data...only iso-codes, afaik.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi,
what "minor" problems does Kurdish have? Some languages (Belarusian, Greek, Welsh, Wolof, Kurdish) have
various "minor" problems in 2nd stage.
You are right, we have not yet tested it, I will try to do so in the near future.
I was looking at the status page for level 2 Kurdish, which showed
19 matches
Mail list logo
