On Sun, Oct 26 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> On Sunday 26 October 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
>> > the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the
>> > Debian Social contract. That's why
>> > http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1 got removed and the current
>> > version can be found in
>
On Sun, Oct 26 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
>> the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the Debian
>> Social contract. That's why http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1> got
>> removed and the current version can be found in
>> http://www.debian.org/social_contract.
> Why wasn't
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 10:13:22PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > The languages Dutch and Turkish are outdated and based on revision 1.1
> > of the English file
>
> Where did you get this strange idea that the Dutch translation was
> outdated anyway? The translation check header for social_contract.
> The languages Dutch and Turkish are outdated and based on revision 1.1
> of the English file
Where did you get this strange idea that the Dutch translation was
outdated anyway? The translation check header for social_contract.1.1.wml
in the Dutch translation clearly says (said) that it's based
On Sunday 26 October 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
> > the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the
> > Debian Social contract. That's why
> > http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1 got removed and the current
> > version can be found in
> > http://www.debian.org/social_contract.
>
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 09:39:49PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the Debian
> > Social contract. That's why http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1
> > got removed and the current version can be found in
> > http://www.debian.org/social_co
> the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the Debian
> Social contract. That's why http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1
> got removed and the current version can be found in
> http://www.debian.org/social_contract.
Why wasn't this done in a way that would have kept existin
Hi,
the Debian website contained two nearly identical copies of the Debian Social
contract. That's why http://www.debian.org/social_contract.1.1 got removed and
the current version can be found in http://www.debian.org/social_contract.
The following languages miss now a translation of
http://www.
8 matches
Mail list logo