> "daniel" == Daniel Macêdo Batista <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/,
>> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
>> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
daniel> I tried access now but the server is not available :(
daniel> [...]
I hope it come b
Em 27/4/2005, "Otavio Salvador" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
>Hello folks,
Hi Otavio!
>
>Like I proposed, I converted all CVS repository to Subversion[1].
>
>1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/,
> svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
> svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
I tried access now but t
Hello folks,
Like I proposed, I converted all CVS repository to Subversion[1].
1. http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/ddtp/,
svn://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/ddtp/
Current layout of the repository is:
- branches/
. a/ included on original source. We need to decide wh
> "martin" == Martin Zobel-Helas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
martin> Hi Andreas,
martin> On Wednesday, 20 Apr 2005, you wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>>
>> >>I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and
>> then we >oh no. It is
Hi Andreas,
On Wednesday, 20 Apr 2005, you wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
>
> >>I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we
> >oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different
> >for now. Another one might like arch more, even a
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we
oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different
for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like
to use even another version control system.
Hi Otavio,
On Tuesday, 19 Apr 2005, you wrote:
>
> I think is best move all there, convert to subversion, and then we
oh no. It is CVS now, and we should'nt move it to something different
for now. Another one might like arch more, even an otherone might like
to use even another version control sy
7 matches
Mail list logo