On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:46AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jamil,
> >
> > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jamil,
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
>> >> >
Hi Jamil,
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:16:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> > I've noticed there are some missing glyph
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's
Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or a
While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or an error
in the po file.
any hints from original transla
6 matches
Mail list logo