Am Samstag, den 05.07.2008, 21:27 +0100 schrieb Miguel Figueiredo:
> A Saturday 05 July 2008 19:22:20, Esko Arajärvi escreveu:
> > One of the most irritating situations for a translator (at least for me) is
> > when package maintainer marks a translation bug closed but forgets to add
> > the po fil
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Looking through the current checks, the patch could probably be safely
> reduced by simply running the main checks against all of the maintainer
> scripts, rather than just config and postinst; there are a couple of
> checks which are specific to ind
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 15:01 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> "Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>
> >> This should of course just be
> >> for each of config, postinst
>
> > Hrm, or should it? The current lintian debconf checks o
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Perhaps unsurprisingly, debconf itself throws up quite a few false
> positives as debconf-apt-progress makes use of a number of templates
> which are otherwise unused. If desirable, debconf could be exempted from
> the check, as it is from some of th
"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> This should of course just be
>> for each of config, postinst
> Hrm, or should it? The current lintian debconf checks only check config
> and postinst, but checking the other maintainer sc
Quoting Esko Arajärvi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 1. Changelog proclaims a bug closed
> 2. The bug is marked with tags l10n and patch
> 3. There's a po file attached to the bug report
> 4. This po file is not in the package's po directory
That would give false positives in the case where a maintainer
A Saturday 05 July 2008 19:22:20, Esko Arajärvi escreveu:
> Hi all,
[...]
>
> I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I know
> nothing of lintian's inner workings. Specifically I don't know if it has
> some kind of access to BTS, but let's try.
>
> One of the most irritati
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Hello Lintian maintainers and i18n 'informal team',
>
> Before I report this as a wishlist bug, I'd like to have your input
> on two ideas that popped up in my mind for possible lintian checks wrt
> debconf templates:
>
> 1) Checking i
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 18:22 +, Esko Arajärvi wrote:
> I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I know
> nothing of lintian's inner workings. Specifically I don't know if it has some
> kind of access to BTS, but let's try.
lintian's checks intentionally do not use any
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 15:07 -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> > fairly simple to add, assuming that the following methodology would make
> > sense (on a per-binary package basis):
> >
> > for each of config
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> fairly simple to add, assuming that the following methodology would make
> sense (on a per-binary package basis):
>
> for each of config, preinst, postinst, prerm, postrm
> find uses of db_input
Hi all,
On Thursday, 3. July 2008 05:03, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Before I report this as a wishlist bug, I'd like to have your input
> on two ideas that popped up in my mind for possible lintian checks wrt
> debconf templates:
I got one more idea, but I'm not sure if it is feasible, because I
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 17:02 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
> [...]
> > As far as I can see, such a test does
On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 16:05 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
[...]
> As far as I can see, such a test does not currently exist. It would be
> fairly simple to add, assuming that
Hi,
On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 07:03 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> 1) Checking if a declared template is still used
>
> Sometimes, maintainers rewrite maintainer scripts and remove the use a
> a given debconf template but do not think about dropping it from
> debian/*templates. It therefore clutte
Hello Lintian maintainers and i18n 'informal team',
Before I report this as a wishlist bug, I'd like to have your input
on two ideas that popped up in my mind for possible lintian checks wrt
debconf templates:
1) Checking if a declared template is still used
Sometimes, maintainers rewrite mainta
16 matches
Mail list logo
