Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-17 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On 16 Nov 1997, Mark W. Eichin wrote: > > We should ask the emacs/xemacs maintainers to ship their packages > > preconfigured that way. > > Why? It makes sense for the user-de package to do the 8-bit > customization, but the redefinitions of home/end are not appropriate > in general; they change

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-17 Thread Mark W. Eichin
> We should ask the emacs/xemacs maintainers to ship their packages > preconfigured that way. Why? It makes sense for the user-de package to do the 8-bit customization, but the redefinitions of home/end are not appropriate in general; they change the way emacs responds to those keys in incompatibl

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-17 Thread Enrique Zanardi
On Tue, Nov 04, 1997 at 10:31:58AM +0100, Christian Leutloff wrote: > That's what I added with my user-de package for german users. It > shouldn't break other installations (exept the backspace/delete keys) > > > ;;--- support european keys --- > (set-input-mode (c

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-04 Thread Christian Leutloff
(CC only to debian-i18n, not debian-devel) Enrique Zanardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You're right. So we don't need to touch anything in "less". Let's > continue with another one, what about emacs/xemacs? That's what I added with my user-de package for german users. It shouldn't break other

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-03 Thread Enrique Zanardi
[ Can we restrict this discussion to debian-i18n? I don't want to add another thread to the already overloaded debian-devel ] On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Luis Francisco Gonzalez wrote: > > [ CC: to debian-i18n, where this discussion belongs... ] > > > > On Sat, Nov 01, 1997 at 10:02:54PM +0100, Marco d'

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-03 Thread Luis Francisco Gonzalez
> [ CC: to debian-i18n, where this discussion belongs... ] > > On Sat, Nov 01, 1997 at 10:02:54PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > > > less already works with 8 bit, it just needs the correct $LESSCHARSET. > > We need to decide a way to define that site-wide, to ship "less" > pre-configured to disp

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-03 Thread Magossa'nyi A'rpa'd
On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Joey Hess wrote: > Enrique Zanardi wrote: > > We need to decide a way to define that site-wide, to ship "less" > > pre-configured to display 8 bits. > > That's not good idea. One nice feature of less is that you can safely > view binary files with it, without messing up your

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-03 Thread Joey Hess
Enrique Zanardi wrote: > We need to decide a way to define that site-wide, to ship "less" > pre-configured to display 8 bits. That's not good idea. One nice feature of less is that you can safely view binary files with it, without messing up your terminal with escape sequences; if 8-bit is enable

Re: Consistent kbd config TODO list (was Re: Backspace & Delete)

1997-11-03 Thread Enrique Zanardi
[ CC: to debian-i18n, where this discussion belongs... ] On Sat, Nov 01, 1997 at 10:02:54PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: > less already works with 8 bit, it just needs the correct $LESSCHARSET. We need to decide a way to define that site-wide, to ship "less" pre-configured to display 8 bits.