Hi Christian,
On Sat, Aug 04, 2012 at 08:34:57AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> The nbd Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> for po-debconf, namely bug number 681702 (and maybe othe
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 06:27:51PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer^W^W Wouter,
>
> ("oh no, not him again"...)
>
> The logtool Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fi
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 09:09:27AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Currently existing but incomplete languages:
> ca cs nl pt_BR vi
Except that the Dutch translation has been done. I just don't file
translation bugs against my own packages :-)
--
The biometric identification system at the gat
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 07:43:41AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Dear Debian maintainer,
>
> The logtool Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has
> pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes
> for po-debconf, namely bug number 463310 (and maybe other similar b
Dear Debian I18N people,
I would like to know if some of you would be interested in translating
logtool.
logtool already includes cs.po de.po fr.po it.po ja.po nl.po pt_BR.po sv.po
vi.po.
So do not translate it to these languages (the translators will be
contacted separately).
languaget
On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 05:58:52PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, well, the fallback language is a possible option in a few cases
> such as Northern Sami abovebut this is not a definitive solution
> for most of the currently incomplete languages ?
Why hardcode it?
"While there is a tra
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:27:52PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
> >Which makes "Maintainer" unsuitble for translation maintainers how,
> >exactly?
>
> Because translators mostly don't "maintain" translations but plainly
> "contribute" translations.
Err, no. It is generally preferred that those who t
On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 12:52:36AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Micah Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I'm sorry. If we can't trust these people not to abuse upload
> > > privileges, then I certainly do not want to see them get a say in
> > > deciding how we conduct
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:33:48PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
>
> On 2006/04/07, at 1:39, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> >>But requiring people who are not software developers to understand
> >>they suddenly have become developers because Debian is special is a
> >>littl
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 07:31:12PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
> >>Did it ever occur to you that one can be an active Debian contributor
> >>and not use Debian at all ?
> >
> >No. And even if it did, I fail to see how that is relevant here. You
> >cannot be an active Debian contributor without knowing
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:29:54PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
>
> On 2006/04/06, at 22:21, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >If people don't understand that you don't have to write code to be a
> >developer, then they should be told. If they are told, and they
> >mi
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:33:05PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
>
> On 2006/04/06, at 22:50, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>
> >And anyway, it's not like people who should consider to join have
> >nothing to do with Debian and don't know the particularities of its
> >culture - even if this is unclear
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 07:19:22AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Hi Steve,
> you and others use the word 'contributing', 'contribute',
> 'contributions'. So why not 'Debian Contributor'.
Ghaah.
Because I'm a developer, who develops an operating system, not just
someone who merely 'contributes' to it
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 04:19:59PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
> I'd be a little more radical :)
>
> >begin rewording proposal
> >The Debian New Maintainer process, is the process of becoming an
> >official
> >Debian Developer (DD). These webpages are the place were
> >prospective Debian
> >De
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 09:14:50PM +0900, JC Helary wrote:
>
> On 2006/04/05, at 20:37, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
>
> >JC Helary wrote:
> >>It is not a mistaken belief, it directly comes from:
> >>http://www.debian.org/devel/join/newmaint
> >
> >It is a mistaken belief. That page is just poor
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 07:27:05AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> Clytie Siddall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I don't understand why this election is restricted to Debian
> > Developers. What about all the other people who regularly contribute
> > time and effort to the Debian project?
>
> This is a known bug,
16 matches
Mail list logo
