[Dropping some CCs now]
On 10 April 2010 02:07, Bjørn Steensrud wrote:
> Other NO people may be better qualified to reply than I am, but here goes:
>
> Fredag 9. april 2010 23.21.45 skrev Raphael Geissert :
>> Locale 'no' is not supported
>> Locale 'no_NO&#x
upported
Locale 'zam' is not supported
Locale 'zh_cn' is not supported
Locale 'zh_TW.Big5' is not supported
Total: 106
Total excluding anything after [...@_.-]: 67
However, if I compare that list with the codes of ISO 639-1..3
(excluding anything after [...@_.-] --
in /usr/share/i18n/locales
Am I missing something or wouldn't adding the 639-3 codes to the list
of known and valid codes be enough?
Cheers,
--
Raphael Geissert - Debian Developer
www.debian.org - get.debian.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
t appropriate ISO
639-1..3 code.)
Sorry for not noticing ISO 639-3 codes were being used back when I
implemented the checks. I verified some of the cases that would trigger the
warning but they were all true positives.
And like Russ said, switching to the "inc" code would be incorrect.
4 matches
Mail list logo
