Re: Review in progress: bacula debconf templates

2010-01-23 Thread John Goerzen
Christian PERRIER wrote: > John, what are your plans regarding all this "debconf review" and > subsequent l10n updates stuff? If you like, I can prepare for you what > would be an NMUbut then leave it up to you to merge it with work > you could have in progress on some other matters. > Hi Chr

Re: Intent to NMU bacula to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2008-08-30 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 08:40:15PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > Blah blah... > > John, I actually intended to send the "soft" version of my "Intent to > NMU" text, which is less "rude" to maintainers. No problem ;-) I do intend to upload myself, and have an upload now. But I'm unclear how

Re: Intent to NMU bacula to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2008-03-25 Thread John Goerzen
On Sun March 23 2008 1:54:02 pm Christian Perrier wrote: > Of course, an upload made by you would even be better...:-) Thanks for the prod. I had missed that the status was updated (probably overly-aggressive use of the delete key in kmail, since I see you updated the bug). Bacula 2.2.8-6 wit

Re: Downgrade of bacula template or error in SMITH process?

2008-02-13 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed February 13 2008 2:14:00 pm Christian Perrier wrote: [ snip ] > What *I* do not have control about is the text that is included by > translators in their bug reports and most use wording such as "please > apply as soon as possible" which is most of the time their standard > text. OK, that

Re: Downgrade of bacula template or error in SMITH process?

2008-02-13 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed February 13 2008 11:18:24 am Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello John, > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 11:10:31AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > On Wed February 13 2008 10:43:16 am Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > > It appears that on Jan 29, I applied the new PO file as given in

Re: Downgrade of bacula template or error in SMITH process?

2008-02-13 Thread John Goerzen
On Wed February 13 2008 10:43:16 am Helge Kreutzmann wrote: > Hello, > bacula went through the SMITH process, the call for updated > translation was going out on Januar 27th. After the German version was > accepted (cf. #462981), the status page(s)[1] show an error in the > template. The version in