On 09/06/2011 08:44, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
If there are features people want/need, now is the time to make say it
some suggestions, for improve the translation speed:
1) space/return: actually if a new packages description has an extra
space/return you have to translate it again.
Fo
On 9 June 2011 18:42, Michal Simunek wrote:
> Very good idea. Here is real model of translating package description
> for our team (Czech - cs). I'm fetching descriptions and give it to the
> translators to translate. Then I review their work, so pending
> translations isn't needed for us, but the
On 09/06/2011 06:54, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Martijn van Oosterhout:
Are there teams that would be annoyed by this (ie disallow anonymous
contributions)?
the Italian team have some anonymous contributors.
I know that one of these have problems to login (I don't know more).
BTW, Ma
On 9 June 2011 09:36, Helge Kreutzmann wrote:
> This is IMHO a very major change. The previous system easily allowed
> working with translations the same way as with e.g. bug reports, by
> simply using e-mail. Whenever I update a package description of mine
> (though this happens rarely) I can sim
Martijn van Oosterhout píše v Čt 09. 06. 2011 v 08:44 +0200:
> As threatened, I've started building a django project which aims
> integrate the DDTSS more closely with the rest of the system. Other
> than performance it should improve maintainability. Since the new
> system will use a real database
2011/6/9 Martijn van Oosterhout :
> As threatened, I've started building a django project which aims
> integrate the DDTSS more closely with the rest of the system. Other
> than performance it should improve maintainability. Since the new
> system will use a real database with a real schema, it bec
Hello,
first of all, thanks for working on DDTS. It is very much appreciated.
Given my (nowadays) involvment[1] in Package Translations is almost
nonexistent, I've one comment to make:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:44:39AM +0200, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> to do certain things. But also because
On 9 June 2011 06:54, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Martijn van Oosterhout (klep...@gmail.com):
>
>> Well, the simplest solution is to simply forbid changes without an account.
>
> I was more or less considering this.
>
> Are there teams that would be annoyed by this (ie disallow anonymous
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
