Quoting Martijn van Oosterhout (klep...@gmail.com):
> We're severals years on and it looks like the "DDTP/DDTSS will
> eventually be replaced by Pootle" is as far away as it ever was. In
It is, I'm afraid, yes.
> the meantime the current system, while it works, is not ideal. It runs
> on a Berkel
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 20:11, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> 2. Long term it would be good if there were more people who could work
> on the system. I have the feeling that the current codebase, being
> essentially Perl with not very good abstractions reduces the number of
> potential contributor
On 2 June 2011 20:25, Martin Bagge / brother wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
>
>> 2. Long term it would be good if there were more people who could work
>> on the system. I have the feeling that the current codebase, being
>> essentially Perl with not very good abstracti
On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
2. Long term it would be good if there were more people who could work
on the system. I have the feeling that the current codebase, being
essentially Perl with not very good abstractions reduces the number of
potential contributors. If I were to
We're severals years on and it looks like the "DDTP/DDTSS will
eventually be replaced by Pootle" is as far away as it ever was. In
the meantime the current system, while it works, is not ideal. It runs
on a Berkeley DB version 1 DB which has suffered some damage in the
past and now contains rubbish
5 matches
Mail list logo
