Announce of an upcoming upload for the fontconfig package

2010-02-06 Thread Christian PERRIER
Dear maintainer of fontconfig and Debian translators, Some days ago, I sent a notice to the maintainer of the fontconfig Debian package, mentioning the status of at least one old po-debconf translation update in the BTS. The package maintainer and I agreed for a translation update round. At the

Re: Intent to NMU fontconfig to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2010-02-06 Thread Keith Packard
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010 07:40:46 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I propose launching a "last chance to get translations" round for 7 > days, then I send you a patch. Would that fit? Sounds perfect -- my pending changes aren't time critical, just a cleanup of some package dependencies. Thanks! --

Re: Intent to NMU fontconfig to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2010-02-06 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Keith Packard (kei...@keithp.com): > On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:46:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER > wrote: > > > The fontconfig Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has > > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes > > for po-debconf, namely bug number 533566 (

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
David Kalnischkies wrote: > 2010/2/6 Frans Pop : >> A correct implementation of l10n support automatically falls back to the >> next best translation. The LANGUAGE environment variable can contain a >> list of languages to fall back to. > Never saw this colon-syntax for fallbacks before, but a quic

Re: Intent to NMU fontconfig to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2010-02-06 Thread Keith Packard
On Sat, 6 Feb 2010 13:46:41 +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > The fontconfig Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has > pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes > for po-debconf, namely bug number 533566 (and maybe other similar bugs). If you've got a patch I

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread David Kalnischkies
2010/2/6 Frans Pop : > (CCing as I'm not sure if you are subscribed to d-i18n) (i am not, so thanks for cc'ing me :) ) > A correct implementation of l10n support automatically falls back to the > next best translation. The LANGUAGE environment variable can contain a > list of languages to fall bac

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
On Saturday 06 February 2010, Marcos wrote: > Remember that some languages have a iso code 2, then they have 3 > letters, as Asturian (ast_ES or ast) :) Sure. My xx, xx_YY examples should be read to also cover xxx and xxx_YY. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread Marcos
>IMO if an 'xx_YY' file is downloaded APT should *always* also download the >corresponding 'xx' file if it exists. Hi again :P Remember that some languages have a iso code 2, then they have 3 letters, as Asturian (ast_ES or ast) :) Thanks. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-i18n-requ...@lists.d

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread Marcos
Hi! First of all: Thanks very much for the answers! My language (ast) and the English (en_US) are a good examples for the bug :) You can see the English version of apt-get update: http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34947585/us_lang_example.png And you can see the Asturian version of apt-get update: h

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread Frans Pop
(CCing as I'm not sure if you are subscribed to d-i18n) > This is btw also true for the rest of the patch [0] as all my questions > in the LongDesc thread [1] remained unanswered. I can answer one part of it. ! And last but not least a question more or less only for the l10n-team: ! APT currentl

Intent to NMU fontconfig to fix pending po-debconf l10n bugs

2010-02-06 Thread Christian PERRIER
Dear Debian maintainer, The fontconfig Debian package, which you are the maintainer of, has pending bug report(s) which include translation updates or fixes for po-debconf, namely bug number 533566 (and maybe other similar bugs). The i18n team is now hunting the very last bits of missing localiza

Re: Bug#448216: Support 3-letter codes for package description translations in APT (was: Re: Bug#448216: Waiting 2 years ago...)

2010-02-06 Thread David Kalnischkies
2010/2/5 Marcos : > We're waiting more of 2 years ago. Don't (busy-)wait for it: Invest the time instead to provide a good patch for it. :) It sometimes also help (as you see now) to poke someone ~ but it is far better to do this with some more information: for example, i didn't know that this "min

Reminder for libphone-utils translation updates

2010-02-06 Thread Christian PERRIER
This is a reminder for the running translation round for debconf templates of libphone-utils. Currently complete languages: de es fr it ja pt ru sv Currently existing but incomplete languages: Please send out updates before Sunday, February 07, 2010. On Monday, February 08, 2010, I will notif