Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org):
> > I'm not sure that belongs to upstream, again. We should refocus on our
> > point, here: D-I. I'm not interested in changing things upstream, or
> > even changing the way you deal with them in the standard console-setup
> > package. You're certainly
[not subscribed, please cc on replies]
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:19:43 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I'm not sure that belongs to upstream, again. We should refocus on our
> point, here: D-I. I'm not interested in changing things upstream, or
> even changing the way you deal with them in the
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 07:19:43AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
>
> That means having a specific way to ask for layouts *in a single
> question* mor eor less combining the layout/variant (and maybe model)
> questions.
This is exactly what the upstream of xkeyboard-config wants to achieve.
Christian Perrier wrote:
I see this as the only way to preserve one key feature of D-I: keeping
things simple for users and minimizing the number of asked questions.
And, also, preserve the rationale where "size matters".
I agree with that, while 2 questions would not be a nightmare for user
Quoting Anton Zinoviev (an...@lml.bas.bg):
> > I have not seen any single "Georgian" keyboard in my entire computing
> > life in France.
>
> Actually fr(geo) is not for Georgian keyboards. It is for typing
> Georgian on a French keyboard.
My point There is no such physical keyboard. Appare
5 matches
Mail list logo